[Freeswitch-users] Can I have FS send a 503?

[Ron McCarthy]

I actaully just used respond with a 503 and that sends back a "Service
unavailable".

If I do: <anti-action application="hangup" data="NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION" /> I
get a busy back on the other side, it looks like application="respond"
actaully works better in this case.

Thanks for the help!


On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Anthony Minessale <
anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote:

> We use the standard rfc q.850 to sip cause code map so you can set
> continue_on_fail=true and hangup with the q.850 that maps to 503 (I forgot
> what it is atm)
>
> On Jan 25, 2009 12:09 PM, "Ron McCarthy" <ronmccar at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to have FS send a 503 / no route found error back? I have
> looked and have not seen a place where you can add a custom sip response
> code like this. I want to return a 503 if they can't call that destination,
> instead of a 404 basically.
>
> Any help would be great, thanks!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20090125/0092f8b9/attachment-0002.html