[Freeswitch-users] xml_cdr call flow

[Michael Collins]

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Luis F Urrea <lfurrea at gmail.com> wrote:
> Heres pastebin of the A-leg
>
> http://pastebin.com/m6731913d
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Michael Collins <msc at freeswitch.org> wrote:
>>
>> Pastebin the whole file so that we can see it in context...
>> -MC
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Luis F Urrea <lfurrea at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On our test calls we haven't been able to correlate times from the A leg
>> > with times from the B leg.
>> >
>> > I would expect something as A-leg(duration)=
>> > B-leg1(duration)+B-leg2(duration)
I don't know that this is necessarily true. Can you pastebin your
dialplan entry (or whatever generated this call) so we can take a
look? Also, please use our pastebin so that it's easier for us to find
stuff:
http://pastebin.freeswitch.org

>> >
>> > Also the <times> tag within <callflow> tag does not seem to be in epoch
>> > microseconds. so it does not seem that's where i should be looking for
>> > that
>> > info.
>> >
>> > Here's an example of the <times> tag for a test call on the A-Leg:
>> >
>> > <times>
>> >       <created_time>1233942283835696</created_time>
>> >       <profile_created_time>1233942283835696</profile_created_time>
>> >       <progress_time>1233942283999716</progress_time>
>> >       <progress_media_time>1233942283999716</progress_media_time>
>> >       <answered_time>1233942287291931</answered_time>
>> >       <hangup_time>0</hangup_time>
>> >       <transfer_time>1233942303240916</transfer_time>
>> >     </times>
>> >
>> > any hint is appreciated
>> >
Perhaps I'm missing something but they sure look like epoch microseconds to me.
-MC