[Freeswitch-users] how to avoid many "|" in bridge application?

[Ken Rice]

That still wouldn¹t work... An action has 2 parameters application and
data... And deeper then that and you have to start re-arranging all sorts of
things...

Continue_on_fail and hangup_after_bridge like tony pointed out are what you
want if you don¹t want to use the | delimiting ... I use these all the time
with gateway counts > 10 just stacking additional actions for each bridge
line



From: "Carlos S. Antunes" <csa at nowthor.com>
Organization: Nowthor Corporation
Reply-To: <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:50:08 -0400
To: <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] how to avoid many "|" in bridge application?

Anthony,

Yes, you are right, I was thinking strictly in terms of SIP gateways. I
guess that instead on the tag "gateway", one could use "channel"? For
example:

<action application="bridge">
   <!-- set some kind of *bridge-specific* variable -->
   <channel order=1 data="sofia/gateway/gw-1/1$1"/>
   <channel order=1 data="sofia/gateway/gw-2/1$1"/>
   <channel order=2 data="sofia/gateway/gw-3/1$1">
       <!-- set some kind of *channel-specific* variable -->
   </channel >
   <channel order=3 data="sofia/gateway/gw-4/1$1"/>
</action>

Would this be acceptable to you?

Regarding the combinations of continue_on_fail and hangup_after bridge, I'll
give that a try although I suspect it will result in less structured and
harder to understand markup...

Thanks!

Carlos

Anthony Minessale wrote:
> This suggestion violates the scope boundaries.
>  
> gateways are specific concept to mod_sofia so a <gateway> tag in <action>
> (part of agnostic xml dialplan)
> does not flow properly.
>  
> you can also use combinations of continue_on_fail and hangup_after bridge so
> you can
> just put each bridge statement in it's own action.
>  
>  
>  
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Carlos S. Antunes <csa at nowthor.com> wrote:
>  
>> Max,
>>  
>> I would like to see something similar too. For example, it would be
>> wonderful if one could specify multiple gateways to try like this or
>> something similar:
>>  
>> <action application="bridge">
>>    <!-- set some kind of *bridge-specific* parameter/variable -->
>>    <gateway order=1 data="sofia/gateway/gw-1/1$1"/>
>>    <gateway order=1 data="sofia/gateway/gw-2/1$1"/>
>>    <gateway order=2 data="sofia/gateway/gw-3/1$1">
>>        <!-- set some kind of *gw-specific* parameter/variable -->
>>    </gateway>
>>    <gateway order=3 data="sofia/gateway/gw-4/1$1"/>
>> </action>
>>  
>> One would be able to avoid the "[]" and "{}" hacks and combine
>> sequential and simultaneous trying of gateways.
>>  
>> What do the developers think of this?
>>  
>> Carlos
>>   
>>  
>> 
>> Max Ivanov wrote:
>>> > Nowdays I 'm forced to put multiple "|" to find first free gateway, ie
>>> > 
>>> sofia/gateway/panas111/1000|sofia/gateway/panas112/1000|sofia/gateway/panas1
>>> 13/1000
>>> > ,
>>> > the whole sting is tooo long, is there any shorter way to write same
>>> thing? Like
>>> > "sofia/gateway/panas*/1000" will try all gateways matching the pattern.
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>> > http://www.freeswitch.org
>>> >
>>> >
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>  FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>  http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>  http://www.freeswitch.org
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> -- 
>> Anthony Minessale II
>>  
>> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
>> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire
>>  
>> AIM: anthm
>>  MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com
>> <mailto:MSN%3Aanthony_minessale at hotmail.com>
>> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com
>> <mailto:PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale at gmail.com>
>> IRC: irc.freenode.net <http://irc.freenode.net> #freeswitch
>>  
>> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
>>  sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org
>> <mailto:sip%3A888 at conference.freeswitch.org>
>>  iax:guest at conference.freeswitch.org/888
>> <http://iax:guest@conference.freeswitch.org/888>
>>  googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org
>> <mailto:googletalk%3Aconf%2B888 at conference.freeswitch.org>
>> pstn:213-799-1400
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>   
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20090825/e560d5a0/attachment-0002.html