[Freeswitch-users] Replace sqlite with couchDB?
nicolas at medularis.com
Sun Apr 12 22:33:26 PDT 2009
Well, if it's too large compared to sqlite maybe it doesn't make sense. But
I was thinking calling data is not always fixed. Depending on what you use
FS for, you might want to get a CDR with many different data linked to each
call, even different kinds of data linked to different calls, that would
make each call very different and variable in its structure, which would fit
a document db model.
Thinking a bit more now, since couchdb is a document-based DB, it might be
good for configuration-generating applications, like the ones consumed by
xml_curl. These are external applications, yet they are still very closely
related to FS, and might be able to benefit from using something like
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Matthew Fong <mattdfong at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
> Just off the top of my head, but I think couchDB is rather large compared
> to sqlite, and I think it's also geared more towards
> storing dynamic datasets...rather ones that can be structured...like FS
> calling data can.
> But I might be wrong :)
> your buddy.
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Nicolas Brenner <nicolas at medularis.com>wrote:
>> Hi, I am not very familiar with FS internals, but I recently found this
>> "new" db engine called couchDB. Looks pretty interesting, and its main focus
>> is scalability.
>> Has anybody played with couchDB? does it make sense to replace sqlite with
>> couchDB in FS?
>> Here's a link to the project homepage:
>> - http://couchdb.apache.org/
>> And here's a video of a presentation given by one of the lead programmers:
>> - http://www.vimeo.com/1992869
>> Freeswitch-users mailing list
>> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users