[Freeswitch-users] Asynchronous communication with FreeSWITCH's mod_event_socket

Michael Jerris mike at jerris.com
Fri Sep 19 09:45:18 PDT 2008


On Sep 19, 2008, at 12:19 PM, Luke Graybill wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Luke Graybill <killarny at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
> My suggested solution is to apply the job-id concept from bgapi to  
> messages as well, and to go a step further; borrow the Asterisk idea  
> of transmitting an identifier along with each command. Every  
> response and event related to that command should then contain the  
> very same identifier in the header.
>
> After speaking with bkw and MikeJ on irc, I'd like to further  
> clarify my suggestion to account for the fact that not all events  
> apply directly to specific commands, but for the ones which do (such  
> as CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE, and for non-events, like command/reply)  
> I believe the suggestion stands :)
>
> Killarny
> _______________________________________________
Can you catalog the specific events this would effect?
Mike

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20080919/febabf6a/attachment-0002.html 


More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list