[Freeswitch-users] Asynchronous communication with FreeSWITCH's mod_event_socket

[Luke Graybill]

Oops, I forgot to mention anthm as well - he provided great feedback on irc!

On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Luke Graybill <killarny at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Luke Graybill <killarny at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> My suggested solution is to apply the job-id concept from bgapi to
>> messages as well, and to go a step further; borrow the Asterisk idea of
>> transmitting an identifier along with each command. Every response and event
>> related to that command should then contain the very same identifier in the
>> header.
>>
>
> After speaking with bkw and MikeJ on irc, I'd like to further clarify my
> suggestion to account for the fact that not all events apply directly to
> specific commands, but for the ones which do (such as
> CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE, and for non-events, like command/reply) I believe
> the suggestion stands :)
>
> Killarny
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20080919/41cddef1/attachment.html