[Freeswitch-users] Windows is slow?

[Michael Giagnocavo]

Hi Per,

        Unlike many projects, FS takes Win32 rather seriously. I.e., bugs in the Windows version do get fixed. So, try a later build and see if you can still repro it. Next, try doing "console loglevel debug" to see if there's any other output there to figure out in more detail what's happening.

-Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Per Møller
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 10:03 AM
To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Windows is slow?

I have installed FS 1.0.0 on a Mac using the precompiled .dmg and FS 1.0.1
on a Windows Vista machine using the precompiled .msi - actually the same
machine).

Using the default configuration files, and using 2 Snom 360 phones I dialed
from extension 1000 to extension 1001. On the Mac, 1001 starts ringing
instantly, but under Windows it takes 1-2 seconds before it starts ringing.

It seems to be in the dialplan the time is spent. From the time I see this
line on the console:

[INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:233 dialplan_hunt() Processing 1000->1000 in
context default

Until the next thing happens it always takes at least 1 full second, but on
the Mac it happens instantly.

Why is the Windows build this much slower? Is it a known problem?

I get the feeling that the majority of the FS community is Unix based, which
is fine by me, but I would really like to know just how well supported and
stable the Win32 build is and if this is currently a viable way to go, or if
I should stick to Linux/BSD/Mac for production use?


// Per


_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org