[Freeswitch-users] 404 Error on incoming calls

[Josip Djuricic]

Hi there,

if I'm not mistaking (if I am Brian or someone else will tell), you can 
do it from the public.xml

Example:
    <extension name="name_of_incoming_extension">
     <condition field="destination_number" 
expression="^(incoming_extension_number_match)$">
        <action application="transfer" data="$1 XML default"/>
      </condition>
     </extension>

If I'm not mistaking with transfer to XML default you do exactly what 
you wanna do.

Josip

Kurt Marasco wrote:
> Thanks Brian and Josip for your responses,
>
> Brian's suggestion did the trick for me. I can both transfer and 
> bridge the call to a registered extension in the default dial plan.
>
> Not sure if If it makes sense to do this, but is there a way to pass 
> the call into the default dial plan and have the default dial plan 
> process the sip invite. I'm able to send the incoming did to a 
> registered endpoint from (in the directory) but can't pass it through 
> to the default and match on the original incoming did.
>
> I'm still confused about what the nat profile does, because I'm behind 
> nat and am not using the nat profile, yet freeswitch seems to be working.
>
>
> Brian West wrote:
>> Kurt,
>> First off let me fill in a few blanks here.
>>
>> Correct me if i'm wrong this looks like an inbound invite to port 
>> 5070 right?  If so then you're not using the default config as it was 
>> designed. (I did the bulk of the config)
>>
>> Here is what you do.  Have your IPKALL did hit your IP on port 5080 
>> instead.. aka the outbound profile.  
>>
>> Then open up dialplan/public.xml and install an extension that can 
>> route to a registered endpoing.  their is a 5551212 example in there.
>>
>> /b
>>
>>
>> On Mar 11, 2008, at 5:02 AM, Kurt Marasco wrote:
>>
>>> Hi I am testing FS and am currently working with the xml dialplan. I 
>>> have FS behind a NAT router and have 2 soft phones functioning on 
>>> another PC behind the router. I currently have working conversations 
>>> when dialing between the extensions set up on each phone.
>>>
>>> I am now trying to call one of the softphones via an IpKall DID. I 
>>> have no problem making this work if I use wikipbx, but can't make it 
>>> work using the xml dialplan, so clearly FS is working and my 
>>> configuration is the issue. I am currently sending the ipkall sip 
>>> invite to port 5070, but have tried 5060 as well.
>>>
>>> Here is the console output from FS when I dial my IpKall DID from my 
>>> land line.
>>>
>>>> nta: received INVITE sip:In-2061234567 at mydomain.com:5070 SIP/2.0 
>>>> (CSeq 102)
>>>> nta: INVITE (102) going to a default leg
>>>> nua(0x8117508): adding session usage
>>>> nta: sent 100 Trying for INVITE (102)
>>>> nua(0x8117508): call state changed: init -> received, received offer
>>>> 2008-03-11 02:25:31 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:522 
>>>> switch_channel_set_name() New Chan 
>>>> sofia/nat/5035557777 at 69.64.180.77:5060 
>>>> [53bb0a56-f059-483e-9e08-d583a9566255]
>>>> 2008-03-11 02:25:32 [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:222 dialplan_hunt() 
>>>> Processing PORTLAND OR->In-2061234567!
>>>> *2008-03-11 02:25:32 [INFO] switch_core_state_machine.c:112 
>>>> switch_core_standard_on_ring() No Route, Aborting*
>>>> 2008-03-11 02:25:32 [NOTICE] switch_core_state_machine.c:113 
>>>> switch_core_standard_on_ring() Hangup 
>>>> sofia/nat/5035557777 at 69.64.180.77:5060 [CS_RING] [NO_ROUTE_DESTINATION]
>>>> nta: sent 404 Not Found for INVITE (102)
>>>> nua(0x8117508): removing session usage
>>>> nua(0x8117508): call state changed: init -> terminated
>>>> nta: received ACK sip:In-2061234567 at mydomain.com:5070 SIP/2.0 (CSeq 
>>>> 102)
>>>> nta: ACK (102) is going to INVITE (102)
>>>> 2008-03-11 02:25:32 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:717 
>>>> switch_core_session_thread() Session 1 
>>>> (sofia/nat/5035557777 at 69.64.180.77:5060) Ended
>>>> 2008-03-11 02:25:32 [NOTICE] switch_core_session.c:719 
>>>> switch_core_session_thread() Close Channel 
>>>> sofia/nat/5035557777 at 69.64.180.77:5060 [CS_HANGUP]
>>> Any thoughts on what I'm doing wrong would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> Kurt
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freeswitch-users mailing list
>>> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org 
>>> <mailto:Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20080314/21f66325/attachment-0002.html