[Freeswitch-users] Memory Leaks

Anthony Minessale anthony.minessale at gmail.com
Wed Jul 30 20:05:08 PDT 2008


i mean how much ram is in use in bytes by FS

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org> wrote:

> Try running 500,000 calls at 100-200 cps with a duration of 1 second.
> You'll always see something about lost memory on shut down and you
> can't fully trust that output due to the usage of memory pools.
> You'll see a running FreeSWITCH hit a high water mark and level off on
> memory usage.  I suspect that if you do this test with that many calls
> you'll see the same usage at some point or it will be more
> pronounced.  100 or 1000 calls isn't enough to really tell what is
> going on.
>
> /b
>
> On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:25 PM, Sangwoo Jin wrote:
>
> >
> > I can't use JIRA because I'm waiting for confirmation of creating
> > account.
> >
> > Now, I tested again with the current svn trunk.
> > The lost memory of 1000 calls is 10 times more than 100 calls.
> >
> > The following logs are my filtered valgrind's output.
> > I have removed the lost blocks log which may not have to be free.
> >
> > Could you check this problem?
> > Sangwoo Jin
> >
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > ======================================================================
> > 100 calls' log
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > ======================================================================
> > ==29384== 284 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record
> > 25 of 60
> > ==29384==    at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D98B43: su_hash_alloc (su_alloc.c:390)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D98CDE: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:562)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> > 2361)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> > 276)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> > ==29384==
> > ==29384==
> >
> > ==29384==
> > ==29384== 504 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 30
> > of 60
> > ==29384==    at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D98CC1: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:559)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> > 2361)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> > 276)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7DA3084: su_base_port_run (su_base_port.c:331)
> > ==29384==
> > ==29384==
> > ==29384== 671 bytes in 8 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 32
> > of 60
> > ==29384==    at 0x4022B08: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D989A2: sub_alloc (su_alloc.c:490)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D9929E: su_alloc (su_alloc.c:771)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D04E15: msg_header_alloc (msg_parser.c:2309)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D0273D: header_parse (msg_parser.c:1114)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D025E3: extract_header (msg_parser.c:1071)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D02315: msg_extract_header (msg_parser.c:1008)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D05BD2: msg_header_parse_str (msg_parser.c:2801)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D05B1E: msg_header_add_str (msg_parser.c:2764)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D7B534: sip_add_tagis (sip_tag_class.c:260)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D42EB4: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2278)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> > ==29384==
> > ==29384==
> > ==29384== 1,072 bytes in 2 blocks are possibly lost in loss record
> > 37 of 60
> > ==29384==    at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D9ABB4: su_zalloc (su_alloc.c:1437)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7DA0A84: su_msg_new (su_root.c:901)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D3E4CB: nua_signal (nua_stack.c:495)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D46FF7: nua_invite (nua.c:633)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7CEB0DE: sofia_glue_do_invite (sofia_glue.c:1305)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7CCA773: sofia_on_init (mod_sofia.c:99)
> > ==29384==    by 0x40A630D: switch_core_session_run
> > (switch_core_state_machine.c:415)
> > ==29384==    by 0x40A52F4: switch_core_session_thread
> > (switch_core_session.c:787)
> > ==29384==    by 0x40FC695: dummy_worker (thread.c:138)
> > ==29384==    by 0x41EB191: start_thread (in /lib/libpthread-2.6.1.so)
> > ==29384==    by 0x42F502D: clone (in /lib/libc-2.6.1.so)
> > ==29384==
> > ==29384==
> > ==29384== 1,295 bytes in 21 blocks are still reachable in loss
> > record 38 of
> > 60
> > ==29384==    at 0x4022B08: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D989A2: sub_alloc (su_alloc.c:490)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D9929E: su_alloc (su_alloc.c:771)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D04E15: msg_header_alloc (msg_parser.c:2309)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D11E7A: msg_header_make (msg_header_make.c:86)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D05A73: msg_header_add_make (msg_parser.c:2729)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D7B503: sip_add_tagis (sip_tag_class.c:256)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D433D8: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> > 2377)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> > ==29384==
> > ==29384==
> > ==29384== 28,116 bytes in 99 blocks are indirectly lost in loss
> > record 55 of
> > 60
> > ==29384==    at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D98B43: su_hash_alloc (su_alloc.c:390)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D98CDE: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:562)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> > 2361)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> > 276)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> > ==29384==
> > ==29384==
> > ==29384== 52,528 bytes in 98 blocks are definitely lost in loss
> > record 56 of
> > 60
> > ==29384==    at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D9ABB4: su_zalloc (su_alloc.c:1437)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7DA0A84: su_msg_new (su_root.c:901)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D3E4CB: nua_signal (nua_stack.c:495)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D46FF7: nua_invite (nua.c:633)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7CEB0DE: sofia_glue_do_invite (sofia_glue.c:1305)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7CCA773: sofia_on_init (mod_sofia.c:99)
> > ==29384==    by 0x40A630D: switch_core_session_run
> > (switch_core_state_machine.c:415)
> > ==29384==    by 0x40A52F4: switch_core_session_thread
> > (switch_core_session.c:787)
> > ==29384==    by 0x40FC695: dummy_worker (thread.c:138)
> > ==29384==    by 0x41EB191: start_thread (in /lib/libpthread-2.6.1.so)
> > ==29384==    by 0x42F502D: clone (in /lib/libc-2.6.1.so)
> > ==29384==
> > ==29384==
> > ==29384== 57,034 bytes in 871 blocks are indirectly lost in loss
> > record 57
> > of 60
> > ==29384==    at 0x4022B08: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D989A2: sub_alloc (su_alloc.c:490)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D9929E: su_alloc (su_alloc.c:771)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D04E15: msg_header_alloc (msg_parser.c:2309)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D11E7A: msg_header_make (msg_header_make.c:86)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D05A73: msg_header_add_make (msg_parser.c:2729)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D7B503: sip_add_tagis (sip_tag_class.c:256)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D42EB4: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2278)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> > 276)
> > ==29384==
> > ==29384==
> > ==29384== 135,046 (49,896 direct, 85,150 indirect) bytes in 99
> > blocks are
> > definitely lost in loss record 58 of 60
> > ==29384==    at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D98CC1: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:559)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> > 2361)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> > 276)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> > ==29384==    by 0x7DA3084: su_base_port_run (su_base_port.c:331)
> > ==29384==
> > ==29384== LEAK SUMMARY:
> > ==29384==    definitely lost: 108,035 bytes in 303 blocks.
> > ==29384==    indirectly lost: 85,177 bytes in 972 blocks.
> > ==29384==      possibly lost: 2,535 bytes in 13 blocks.
> > ==29384==    still reachable: 16,325,250 bytes in 524 blocks.
> > ==29384==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
> >
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > ======================================================================
> > 1000 calls' log
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > =
> > ======================================================================
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612== 3,024 bytes in 6 blocks are still reachable in loss record
> > 39 of
> > 64
> > ==29612==    at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D98CC1: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:559)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> > 2361)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> > 276)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA3084: su_base_port_run (su_base_port.c:331)
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612== 3,692 bytes in 13 blocks are possibly lost in loss record
> > 43 of 64
> > ==29612==    at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D98B43: su_hash_alloc (su_alloc.c:390)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D98CDE: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:562)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> > 2361)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> > 276)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612== 4,322 bytes in 55 blocks are possibly lost in loss record
> > 47 of 64
> > ==29612==    at 0x4022B08: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D989A2: sub_alloc (su_alloc.c:490)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D9929E: su_alloc (su_alloc.c:771)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D9CAA2: su_strdup (su_strdup.c:55)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D05AF3: msg_header_add_str (msg_parser.c:2759)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D7B534: sip_add_tagis (sip_tag_class.c:260)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D42EB4: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2278)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> > 276)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612== 5,360 bytes in 10 blocks are still reachable in loss
> > record 49 of
> > 64
> > ==29612==    at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D9ABB4: su_zalloc (su_alloc.c:1437)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA0A84: su_msg_new (su_root.c:901)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D3E4CB: nua_signal (nua_stack.c:495)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D46FF7: nua_invite (nua.c:633)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7CEB0DE: sofia_glue_do_invite (sofia_glue.c:1305)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7CCA773: sofia_on_init (mod_sofia.c:99)
> > ==29612==    by 0x40A630D: switch_core_session_run
> > (switch_core_state_machine.c:415)
> > ==29612==    by 0x40A52F4: switch_core_session_thread
> > (switch_core_session.c:787)
> > ==29612==    by 0x40FC695: dummy_worker (thread.c:138)
> > ==29612==    by 0x41EB191: start_thread (in /lib/libpthread-2.6.1.so)
> > ==29612==    by 0x42F502D: clone (in /lib/libc-2.6.1.so)
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612== 5,360 bytes in 10 blocks are possibly lost in loss record
> > 50 of 64
> > ==29612==    at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D9ABB4: su_zalloc (su_alloc.c:1437)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA0A84: su_msg_new (su_root.c:901)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D3E4CB: nua_signal (nua_stack.c:495)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D46FF7: nua_invite (nua.c:633)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7CEB0DE: sofia_glue_do_invite (sofia_glue.c:1305)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7CCA773: sofia_on_init (mod_sofia.c:99)
> > ==29612==    by 0x40A630D: switch_core_session_run
> > (switch_core_state_machine.c:415)
> > ==29612==    by 0x40A52F4: switch_core_session_thread
> > (switch_core_session.c:787)
> > ==29612==    by 0x40FC695: dummy_worker (thread.c:138)
> > ==29612==    by 0x41EB191: start_thread (in /lib/libpthread-2.6.1.so)
> > ==29612==    by 0x42F502D: clone (in /lib/libc-2.6.1.so)
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612== 7,056 bytes in 14 blocks are possibly lost in loss record
> > 51 of 64
> > ==29612==    at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D98CC1: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:559)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> > 2361)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> > 276)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA3084: su_base_port_run (su_base_port.c:331)
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612== 9,940 bytes in 35 blocks are still reachable in loss
> > record 54 of
> > 64
> > ==29612==    at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D98B43: su_hash_alloc (su_alloc.c:390)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D98CDE: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:562)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> > 2361)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> > 276)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612== 43,590 bytes in 663 blocks are still reachable in loss
> > record 57
> > of 64
> > ==29612==    at 0x4022B08: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D989A2: sub_alloc (su_alloc.c:490)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D9929E: su_alloc (su_alloc.c:771)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D9CAA2: su_strdup (su_strdup.c:55)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA8FC9: su_vsprintf (su_sprintf.c:80)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA90FA: su_sprintf (su_sprintf.c:125)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D75737: sip_addr_tag (sip_basic.c:993)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D765F1: sip_from_tag (sip_basic.c:1857)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D43155: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2322)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612== 55,728 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss
> > record 58 of
> > 64
> > ==29612==    at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> > ==29612==    by 0xFCE0A57: sf_open (sndfile.c:285)
> > ==29612==    by 0xFCD9FD3: ??? (mod_sndfile.c:174)
> > ==29612==    by 0x40A04A1: switch_core_perform_file_open
> > (switch_core_file.c:100)
> > ==29612==    by 0xFD3549A: ??? (mod_local_stream.c:178)
> > ==29612==    by 0x40FC695: dummy_worker (thread.c:138)
> > ==29612==    by 0x41EB191: start_thread (in /lib/libpthread-2.6.1.so)
> > ==29612==    by 0x42F502D: clone (in /lib/libc-2.6.1.so)
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612== 270,368 bytes in 952 blocks are indirectly lost in loss
> > record 59
> > of 64
> > ==29612==    at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D98B43: su_hash_alloc (su_alloc.c:390)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D98CDE: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:562)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> > 2361)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> > 276)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612== 542,088 bytes in 8,282 blocks are indirectly lost in loss
> > record
> > 60 of 64
> > ==29612==    at 0x4022B08: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D989A2: sub_alloc (su_alloc.c:490)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D9929E: su_alloc (su_alloc.c:771)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D04E15: msg_header_alloc (msg_parser.c:2309)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D0273D: header_parse (msg_parser.c:1114)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D025E3: extract_header (msg_parser.c:1071)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D02315: msg_extract_header (msg_parser.c:1008)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D05BD2: msg_header_parse_str (msg_parser.c:2801)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D05B1E: msg_header_add_str (msg_parser.c:2764)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D7B534: sip_add_tagis (sip_tag_class.c:260)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D42EB4: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2278)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612== 1,305,502 (493,920 direct, 811,582 indirect) bytes in 980
> > blocks
> > are definitely lost in loss record 62 of 64
> > ==29612==    at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D98CC1: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:559)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:
> > 2361)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:
> > 276)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA3084: su_base_port_run (su_base_port.c:331)
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612== 526,154 (525,280 direct, 874 indirect) bytes in 980 blocks
> > are
> > definitely lost in loss record 63 of 64
> > ==29612==    at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D9ABB4: su_zalloc (su_alloc.c:1437)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7DA0A84: su_msg_new (su_root.c:901)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D3E4CB: nua_signal (nua_stack.c:495)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7D46FF7: nua_invite (nua.c:633)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7CEB0DE: sofia_glue_do_invite (sofia_glue.c:1305)
> > ==29612==    by 0x7CCA773: sofia_on_init (mod_sofia.c:99)
> > ==29612==    by 0x40A630D: switch_core_session_run
> > (switch_core_state_machine.c:415)
> > ==29612==    by 0x40A52F4: switch_core_session_thread
> > (switch_core_session.c:787)
> > ==29612==    by 0x40FC695: dummy_worker (thread.c:138)
> > ==29612==    by 0x41EB191: start_thread (in /lib/libpthread-2.6.1.so)
> > ==29612==    by 0x42F502D: clone (in /lib/libc-2.6.1.so)
> > ==29612==
> > ==29612== LEAK SUMMARY:
> > ==29612==    definitely lost: 1,024,811 bytes in 2,066 blocks.
> > ==29612==    indirectly lost: 812,483 bytes in 9,236 blocks.
> > ==29612==      possibly lost: 20,718 bytes in 94 blocks.
> > ==29612==    still reachable: 16,441,313 bytes in 1,217 blocks.
> > ==29612==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-
> >> users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael Jerris
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:26 PM
> >> To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Memory Leaks
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jul 30, 2008, at 8:33 AM, Sangwoo Jin wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I I'm testing freeswitch with sipp.
> >>> My test configuration is the following:
> >>> Sipp(caller) -> freeswitch -> Sipp(callee)s
> >>> Testing loads are 5 CPS ~ 30 CPS and caller has hanged up a call as
> >>> soon as
> >>> receiving 200 OK.
> >>>
> >>> In this testing environment, freeswitch's used memory is growing
> >>> continuously.
> >>>
> >>> The following is the valgrind's log on testing with 5 CPS 100 calls.
> >>>
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Is this problem's cause configuration mistake or freeswitch's bug?
> >>>
> >>> Sangwoo Jin
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> You will need to compare the valgrind output from about 100 calls to
> >> about 1000 calls to see which are actually larger.  Also, please make
> >> sure you are using current svn trunk.  Most of the items in that list
> >> appear to be things that we allocate at startup and never bother to
> >> free as they are free when the application stops.  Those items are
> >> supposed to be allocated for the entire life of the switch.  If you
> >> have reports that are definitely more please report this to our bug
> >> tracker at http://jira.freeswitch.org with exact details how you are
> >> testing including how you are initiating the call and your dialplan.
> >>
> >> Mike
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> >> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> >> UNSUBSCRIBE:
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> >> http://www.freeswitch.org
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freeswitch-users mailing list
> > Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>



-- 
Anthony Minessale II

FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/

AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com <MSN%3Aanthony_minessale at hotmail.com>
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com<PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale at gmail.com>
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org <sip%3A888 at conference.freeswitch.org>
iax:guest at conference.freeswitch.org/888
googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org<googletalk%3Aconf%2B888 at conference.freeswitch.org>
pstn:213-799-1400
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20080730/ba36e992/attachment-0002.html 


More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list