[Freeswitch-users] Memory Leaks
Sangwoo Jin
swjinjin at volans.kr
Wed Jul 30 19:25:05 PDT 2008
I can't use JIRA because I'm waiting for confirmation of creating account.
Now, I tested again with the current svn trunk.
The lost memory of 1000 calls is 10 times more than 100 calls.
The following logs are my filtered valgrind's output.
I have removed the lost blocks log which may not have to be free.
Could you check this problem?
Sangwoo Jin
============================================================================
100 calls' log
============================================================================
==29384== 284 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 25 of 60
==29384== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==29384== by 0x7D98B43: su_hash_alloc (su_alloc.c:390)
==29384== by 0x7D98CDE: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:562)
==29384== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
==29384== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
==29384== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:2361)
==29384== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
==29384== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
==29384== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
==29384== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
==29384== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:276)
==29384== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
==29384==
==29384==
==29384==
==29384== 504 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 30 of 60
==29384== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==29384== by 0x7D98CC1: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:559)
==29384== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
==29384== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
==29384== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:2361)
==29384== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
==29384== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
==29384== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
==29384== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
==29384== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:276)
==29384== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
==29384== by 0x7DA3084: su_base_port_run (su_base_port.c:331)
==29384==
==29384==
==29384== 671 bytes in 8 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 32 of 60
==29384== at 0x4022B08: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
==29384== by 0x7D989A2: sub_alloc (su_alloc.c:490)
==29384== by 0x7D9929E: su_alloc (su_alloc.c:771)
==29384== by 0x7D04E15: msg_header_alloc (msg_parser.c:2309)
==29384== by 0x7D0273D: header_parse (msg_parser.c:1114)
==29384== by 0x7D025E3: extract_header (msg_parser.c:1071)
==29384== by 0x7D02315: msg_extract_header (msg_parser.c:1008)
==29384== by 0x7D05BD2: msg_header_parse_str (msg_parser.c:2801)
==29384== by 0x7D05B1E: msg_header_add_str (msg_parser.c:2764)
==29384== by 0x7D7B534: sip_add_tagis (sip_tag_class.c:260)
==29384== by 0x7D42EB4: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2278)
==29384== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
==29384==
==29384==
==29384== 1,072 bytes in 2 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 37 of 60
==29384== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==29384== by 0x7D9ABB4: su_zalloc (su_alloc.c:1437)
==29384== by 0x7DA0A84: su_msg_new (su_root.c:901)
==29384== by 0x7D3E4CB: nua_signal (nua_stack.c:495)
==29384== by 0x7D46FF7: nua_invite (nua.c:633)
==29384== by 0x7CEB0DE: sofia_glue_do_invite (sofia_glue.c:1305)
==29384== by 0x7CCA773: sofia_on_init (mod_sofia.c:99)
==29384== by 0x40A630D: switch_core_session_run
(switch_core_state_machine.c:415)
==29384== by 0x40A52F4: switch_core_session_thread
(switch_core_session.c:787)
==29384== by 0x40FC695: dummy_worker (thread.c:138)
==29384== by 0x41EB191: start_thread (in /lib/libpthread-2.6.1.so)
==29384== by 0x42F502D: clone (in /lib/libc-2.6.1.so)
==29384==
==29384==
==29384== 1,295 bytes in 21 blocks are still reachable in loss record 38 of
60
==29384== at 0x4022B08: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
==29384== by 0x7D989A2: sub_alloc (su_alloc.c:490)
==29384== by 0x7D9929E: su_alloc (su_alloc.c:771)
==29384== by 0x7D04E15: msg_header_alloc (msg_parser.c:2309)
==29384== by 0x7D11E7A: msg_header_make (msg_header_make.c:86)
==29384== by 0x7D05A73: msg_header_add_make (msg_parser.c:2729)
==29384== by 0x7D7B503: sip_add_tagis (sip_tag_class.c:256)
==29384== by 0x7D433D8: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:2377)
==29384== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
==29384== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
==29384== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
==29384== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
==29384==
==29384==
==29384== 28,116 bytes in 99 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record 55 of
60
==29384== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==29384== by 0x7D98B43: su_hash_alloc (su_alloc.c:390)
==29384== by 0x7D98CDE: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:562)
==29384== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
==29384== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
==29384== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:2361)
==29384== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
==29384== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
==29384== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
==29384== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
==29384== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:276)
==29384== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
==29384==
==29384==
==29384== 52,528 bytes in 98 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 56 of
60
==29384== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==29384== by 0x7D9ABB4: su_zalloc (su_alloc.c:1437)
==29384== by 0x7DA0A84: su_msg_new (su_root.c:901)
==29384== by 0x7D3E4CB: nua_signal (nua_stack.c:495)
==29384== by 0x7D46FF7: nua_invite (nua.c:633)
==29384== by 0x7CEB0DE: sofia_glue_do_invite (sofia_glue.c:1305)
==29384== by 0x7CCA773: sofia_on_init (mod_sofia.c:99)
==29384== by 0x40A630D: switch_core_session_run
(switch_core_state_machine.c:415)
==29384== by 0x40A52F4: switch_core_session_thread
(switch_core_session.c:787)
==29384== by 0x40FC695: dummy_worker (thread.c:138)
==29384== by 0x41EB191: start_thread (in /lib/libpthread-2.6.1.so)
==29384== by 0x42F502D: clone (in /lib/libc-2.6.1.so)
==29384==
==29384==
==29384== 57,034 bytes in 871 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record 57
of 60
==29384== at 0x4022B08: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
==29384== by 0x7D989A2: sub_alloc (su_alloc.c:490)
==29384== by 0x7D9929E: su_alloc (su_alloc.c:771)
==29384== by 0x7D04E15: msg_header_alloc (msg_parser.c:2309)
==29384== by 0x7D11E7A: msg_header_make (msg_header_make.c:86)
==29384== by 0x7D05A73: msg_header_add_make (msg_parser.c:2729)
==29384== by 0x7D7B503: sip_add_tagis (sip_tag_class.c:256)
==29384== by 0x7D42EB4: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2278)
==29384== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
==29384== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
==29384== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
==29384== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:276)
==29384==
==29384==
==29384== 135,046 (49,896 direct, 85,150 indirect) bytes in 99 blocks are
definitely lost in loss record 58 of 60
==29384== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==29384== by 0x7D98CC1: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:559)
==29384== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
==29384== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
==29384== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:2361)
==29384== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
==29384== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
==29384== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
==29384== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
==29384== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:276)
==29384== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
==29384== by 0x7DA3084: su_base_port_run (su_base_port.c:331)
==29384==
==29384== LEAK SUMMARY:
==29384== definitely lost: 108,035 bytes in 303 blocks.
==29384== indirectly lost: 85,177 bytes in 972 blocks.
==29384== possibly lost: 2,535 bytes in 13 blocks.
==29384== still reachable: 16,325,250 bytes in 524 blocks.
==29384== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
============================================================================
1000 calls' log
============================================================================
==29612==
==29612== 3,024 bytes in 6 blocks are still reachable in loss record 39 of
64
==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==29612== by 0x7D98CC1: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:559)
==29612== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
==29612== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
==29612== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:2361)
==29612== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
==29612== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
==29612== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
==29612== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
==29612== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:276)
==29612== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
==29612== by 0x7DA3084: su_base_port_run (su_base_port.c:331)
==29612==
==29612==
==29612== 3,692 bytes in 13 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 43 of 64
==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==29612== by 0x7D98B43: su_hash_alloc (su_alloc.c:390)
==29612== by 0x7D98CDE: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:562)
==29612== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
==29612== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
==29612== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:2361)
==29612== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
==29612== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
==29612== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
==29612== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
==29612== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:276)
==29612== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
==29612==
==29612==
==29612== 4,322 bytes in 55 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 47 of 64
==29612== at 0x4022B08: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
==29612== by 0x7D989A2: sub_alloc (su_alloc.c:490)
==29612== by 0x7D9929E: su_alloc (su_alloc.c:771)
==29612== by 0x7D9CAA2: su_strdup (su_strdup.c:55)
==29612== by 0x7D05AF3: msg_header_add_str (msg_parser.c:2759)
==29612== by 0x7D7B534: sip_add_tagis (sip_tag_class.c:260)
==29612== by 0x7D42EB4: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2278)
==29612== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
==29612== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
==29612== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
==29612== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:276)
==29612== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
==29612==
==29612==
==29612== 5,360 bytes in 10 blocks are still reachable in loss record 49 of
64
==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==29612== by 0x7D9ABB4: su_zalloc (su_alloc.c:1437)
==29612== by 0x7DA0A84: su_msg_new (su_root.c:901)
==29612== by 0x7D3E4CB: nua_signal (nua_stack.c:495)
==29612== by 0x7D46FF7: nua_invite (nua.c:633)
==29612== by 0x7CEB0DE: sofia_glue_do_invite (sofia_glue.c:1305)
==29612== by 0x7CCA773: sofia_on_init (mod_sofia.c:99)
==29612== by 0x40A630D: switch_core_session_run
(switch_core_state_machine.c:415)
==29612== by 0x40A52F4: switch_core_session_thread
(switch_core_session.c:787)
==29612== by 0x40FC695: dummy_worker (thread.c:138)
==29612== by 0x41EB191: start_thread (in /lib/libpthread-2.6.1.so)
==29612== by 0x42F502D: clone (in /lib/libc-2.6.1.so)
==29612==
==29612==
==29612== 5,360 bytes in 10 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 50 of 64
==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==29612== by 0x7D9ABB4: su_zalloc (su_alloc.c:1437)
==29612== by 0x7DA0A84: su_msg_new (su_root.c:901)
==29612== by 0x7D3E4CB: nua_signal (nua_stack.c:495)
==29612== by 0x7D46FF7: nua_invite (nua.c:633)
==29612== by 0x7CEB0DE: sofia_glue_do_invite (sofia_glue.c:1305)
==29612== by 0x7CCA773: sofia_on_init (mod_sofia.c:99)
==29612== by 0x40A630D: switch_core_session_run
(switch_core_state_machine.c:415)
==29612== by 0x40A52F4: switch_core_session_thread
(switch_core_session.c:787)
==29612== by 0x40FC695: dummy_worker (thread.c:138)
==29612== by 0x41EB191: start_thread (in /lib/libpthread-2.6.1.so)
==29612== by 0x42F502D: clone (in /lib/libc-2.6.1.so)
==29612==
==29612==
==29612== 7,056 bytes in 14 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 51 of 64
==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==29612== by 0x7D98CC1: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:559)
==29612== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
==29612== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
==29612== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:2361)
==29612== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
==29612== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
==29612== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
==29612== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
==29612== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:276)
==29612== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
==29612== by 0x7DA3084: su_base_port_run (su_base_port.c:331)
==29612==
==29612==
==29612== 9,940 bytes in 35 blocks are still reachable in loss record 54 of
64
==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==29612== by 0x7D98B43: su_hash_alloc (su_alloc.c:390)
==29612== by 0x7D98CDE: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:562)
==29612== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
==29612== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
==29612== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:2361)
==29612== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
==29612== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
==29612== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
==29612== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
==29612== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:276)
==29612== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
==29612==
==29612==
==29612==
==29612== 43,590 bytes in 663 blocks are still reachable in loss record 57
of 64
==29612== at 0x4022B08: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
==29612== by 0x7D989A2: sub_alloc (su_alloc.c:490)
==29612== by 0x7D9929E: su_alloc (su_alloc.c:771)
==29612== by 0x7D9CAA2: su_strdup (su_strdup.c:55)
==29612== by 0x7DA8FC9: su_vsprintf (su_sprintf.c:80)
==29612== by 0x7DA90FA: su_sprintf (su_sprintf.c:125)
==29612== by 0x7D75737: sip_addr_tag (sip_basic.c:993)
==29612== by 0x7D765F1: sip_from_tag (sip_basic.c:1857)
==29612== by 0x7D43155: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2322)
==29612== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
==29612== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
==29612== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
==29612==
==29612==
==29612== 55,728 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 58 of
64
==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==29612== by 0xFCE0A57: sf_open (sndfile.c:285)
==29612== by 0xFCD9FD3: ??? (mod_sndfile.c:174)
==29612== by 0x40A04A1: switch_core_perform_file_open
(switch_core_file.c:100)
==29612== by 0xFD3549A: ??? (mod_local_stream.c:178)
==29612== by 0x40FC695: dummy_worker (thread.c:138)
==29612== by 0x41EB191: start_thread (in /lib/libpthread-2.6.1.so)
==29612== by 0x42F502D: clone (in /lib/libc-2.6.1.so)
==29612==
==29612==
==29612== 270,368 bytes in 952 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record 59
of 64
==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==29612== by 0x7D98B43: su_hash_alloc (su_alloc.c:390)
==29612== by 0x7D98CDE: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:562)
==29612== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
==29612== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
==29612== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:2361)
==29612== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
==29612== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
==29612== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
==29612== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
==29612== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:276)
==29612== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
==29612==
==29612==
==29612== 542,088 bytes in 8,282 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record
60 of 64
==29612== at 0x4022B08: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
==29612== by 0x7D989A2: sub_alloc (su_alloc.c:490)
==29612== by 0x7D9929E: su_alloc (su_alloc.c:771)
==29612== by 0x7D04E15: msg_header_alloc (msg_parser.c:2309)
==29612== by 0x7D0273D: header_parse (msg_parser.c:1114)
==29612== by 0x7D025E3: extract_header (msg_parser.c:1071)
==29612== by 0x7D02315: msg_extract_header (msg_parser.c:1008)
==29612== by 0x7D05BD2: msg_header_parse_str (msg_parser.c:2801)
==29612== by 0x7D05B1E: msg_header_add_str (msg_parser.c:2764)
==29612== by 0x7D7B534: sip_add_tagis (sip_tag_class.c:260)
==29612== by 0x7D42EB4: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2278)
==29612== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
==29612==
==29612==
==29612== 1,305,502 (493,920 direct, 811,582 indirect) bytes in 980 blocks
are definitely lost in loss record 62 of 64
==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==29612== by 0x7D98CC1: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:559)
==29612== by 0x7D06390: msg_create (msg.c:61)
==29612== by 0x7D2490A: nta_msg_create (nta.c:2831)
==29612== by 0x7D4336A: nua_client_request_template (nua_stack.c:2361)
==29612== by 0x7D42C8E: nua_client_init_request (nua_stack.c:2223)
==29612== by 0x7D4256D: nua_client_create (nua_stack.c:2043)
==29612== by 0x7D55125: nua_stack_invite (nua_session.c:701)
==29612== by 0x7D3EA92: nua_stack_signal (nua_stack.c:592)
==29612== by 0x7DA2FA9: su_base_port_execute_msgs (su_base_port.c:276)
==29612== by 0x7DA2D50: su_base_port_getmsgs (su_base_port.c:198)
==29612== by 0x7DA3084: su_base_port_run (su_base_port.c:331)
==29612==
==29612==
==29612== 526,154 (525,280 direct, 874 indirect) bytes in 980 blocks are
definitely lost in loss record 63 of 64
==29612== at 0x4021C2E: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==29612== by 0x7D9ABB4: su_zalloc (su_alloc.c:1437)
==29612== by 0x7DA0A84: su_msg_new (su_root.c:901)
==29612== by 0x7D3E4CB: nua_signal (nua_stack.c:495)
==29612== by 0x7D46FF7: nua_invite (nua.c:633)
==29612== by 0x7CEB0DE: sofia_glue_do_invite (sofia_glue.c:1305)
==29612== by 0x7CCA773: sofia_on_init (mod_sofia.c:99)
==29612== by 0x40A630D: switch_core_session_run
(switch_core_state_machine.c:415)
==29612== by 0x40A52F4: switch_core_session_thread
(switch_core_session.c:787)
==29612== by 0x40FC695: dummy_worker (thread.c:138)
==29612== by 0x41EB191: start_thread (in /lib/libpthread-2.6.1.so)
==29612== by 0x42F502D: clone (in /lib/libc-2.6.1.so)
==29612==
==29612== LEAK SUMMARY:
==29612== definitely lost: 1,024,811 bytes in 2,066 blocks.
==29612== indirectly lost: 812,483 bytes in 9,236 blocks.
==29612== possibly lost: 20,718 bytes in 94 blocks.
==29612== still reachable: 16,441,313 bytes in 1,217 blocks.
==29612== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-
> users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael Jerris
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:26 PM
> To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Memory Leaks
>
>
> On Jul 30, 2008, at 8:33 AM, Sangwoo Jin wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I I'm testing freeswitch with sipp.
> > My test configuration is the following:
> > Sipp(caller) -> freeswitch -> Sipp(callee)s
> > Testing loads are 5 CPS ~ 30 CPS and caller has hanged up a call as
> > soon as
> > receiving 200 OK.
> >
> > In this testing environment, freeswitch's used memory is growing
> > continuously.
> >
> > The following is the valgrind's log on testing with 5 CPS 100 calls.
> >
> <snip>
>
> >
> >
> > Is this problem's cause configuration mistake or freeswitch's bug?
> >
> > Sangwoo Jin
> >
> >
>
>
> You will need to compare the valgrind output from about 100 calls to
> about 1000 calls to see which are actually larger. Also, please make
> sure you are using current svn trunk. Most of the items in that list
> appear to be things that we allocate at startup and never bother to
> free as they are free when the application stops. Those items are
> supposed to be allocated for the entire life of the switch. If you
> have reports that are definitely more please report this to our bug
> tracker at http://jira.freeswitch.org with exact details how you are
> testing including how you are initiating the call and your dialplan.
>
> Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list