[Freeswitch-users] Having FreeSwitch using UDP only

Tzury Bar Yochay tzury.by at gmail.com
Wed Jul 30 09:35:14 PDT 2008


What if by violating an RFC one gets higher scalability and reliability -
would it harm anybody?
I only care about bottom line end of the day results. being lightweight
highly important in my case.

Thank you all for your prompt responsiveness  -- freeSwitch community seems
to make a good feeling to new comers.

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org> wrote:

> Doing so will cause your install to violate the RFC.  But you asked so
> here you go.
>
> <param name="bind-params" value="transport=udp"/> on the profile
> should do what you want.
>
> Remember the RFC says that TCP is NOT optional and is required to be
> RFC compliant. ;)
>
> /b
>
> On Jul 30, 2008, at 8:53 AM, afro.systems at gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > A newbie question,
> >
> > Is it possible to configure FreeSwitch to be using UDP only even
> > fore the signaling?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Tzury Bar Yochay
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freeswitch-users mailing list
> > Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > http://www.freeswitch.org
>
> Brian West
> sip:brian at freeswitch.org <sip%3Abrian at freeswitch.org>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>



-- 
Tzury Bar Yochay
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20080730/ff50cb8e/attachment-0002.html 


More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list