[Freeswitch-users] lumenvox issue

[Frederick Jabre]

 That did help a bit. It will still spike to 60-100% occasionally but its a
noticeable difference. Now its mostly between 3-20% CPU.

In lumenvox there is a way to tell the speech engine to only detect when the
soundfile is finished playing. Is there a way to do that here? or is it set
to interrupt-speaker mode all the time..?

Fred

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org> wrote:

> Please SVN update you'll see 1-6% cpu on the detector also cd libs; rm -rf
> pocketsphinx* sphinxbase*
> I'm pretty sure that was the issue .. I made it stop feeding the recognizer
> when we stopped talking.
>
> /b
>
>
>
> On Jul 14, 2008, at 12:30 PM, Frederick Jabre wrote:
>
>
>  Very well. Even at 30-40% CPU we'll have problem's scaling. Some more
> testing reveals that it's probably somewhere between 40-100% for 9 out of 10
> of interps BUT interestingly enough the footprint in memory is quite low as
> compared to lumenvox, hovering around 3-5% mem usage compared to lumenvox's
> 25%-30% memory for a single interp. Ouch..!
>
>   Some weird trade-off..? Memory for CPU usage. I hate those. Space/Time
> tradeoff crap. Brings back memories from comp lab...
>
>   I'll toss some conditional additional cash at him if he can optimize this
> further. ;)
>
> Fred
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org> wrote:
>
>> It wasn't doing this till he did some fixes for the confidence score.
>> I know when I was working on and testing while we were writing
>> mod_pocketsphinx it sure didn't jump like that.. 30-40% tops with a
>> few spikes to 100%.  I personally tossed some money at him for the
>> confidence score stuff which is the root of the evilness 100% cpu I
>> suspect because it didn't do that before those last few changes went in.
>>
>> /b
>>
>> On Jul 14, 2008, at 11:35 AM, Frederick Jabre wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >  What kind of hardware you running it on? This has been going to
>> > 100% CPU almost every time it does an interp for me.
>> > Tested on my P4 box and my AMD 4200+ Dual both with 1GB ram. Both
>> > with the same awful results. This can't be right given this thing
>> > was designed to run on an ARM processor.
>> >
>> >  I emailed Dave about it as well. Perhaps we need to incent him
>> > more ;)
>> >
>> > Fred
>>
>> Brian West
>> sip:brian at freeswitch.org <sip%3Abrian at freeswitch.org>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freeswitch-users mailing list
>> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
> Brian West
> sip:brian at freeswitch.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20080714/f8f8e492/attachment-0002.html