[Freeswitch-users] Spidermonkey ODBC

David Revill davidrevill at datarun.co.uk
Tue Feb 19 17:37:28 EST 2008


Unfortunately, there isn't a universal ansi sql stmt that will do it as the only statements which can be guaranteed to follow the ansi standard are the simple select, update and delete statements which rely on knowing some table name .  

I think we are trying to solve a problem which need not exist. The Javascript application should handle the idle timeout. It should close the connection if it will not be using it for a while, and,if it needs to, can do what db_is_up is attempting to do in the application code. Testing for connection before every query seems an unneccessary overhead. 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Anthony Minessale 
  To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 6:38 PM
  Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Spidermonkey ODBC


  is there some universal ansi sql stmt that is small and harmless
  but is supported by everything? to replace "select 1"




  Anthony Minessale II

  FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
  ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/

  AIM: anthm
  MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com
  GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com
  IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

  FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
  sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org
  iax:guest at conference.freeswitch.org/888
  googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org
  pstn:213-799-1400



  ----- Original Message ----
  From: David Revill <davidrevill at datarun.co.uk>
  To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
  Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 6:56:31 AM
  Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Spidermonkey ODBC


  One way to detect firebird would be to put the 'Select first 1  * from RDB$relations' into switch_odbc_handle_connect. If it succeeds then it is Firebird. A better query might be 'select * from rdb$database' as the system table rdb$database only ever has 1 record.
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Jonas Gauffin 
    To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org 
    Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 12:18 PM
    Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Spidermonkey ODBC


    I''ve only tested it with firebird on windows. As you said, your driver name doesnt match any of the names I used to detect if it's firebird.

    The problem is that most databases supports "SELECT 1" as a query. It will always be successful if the the connection is up. However, firebird did not support "SELECT 1" and therefore i did query the system database instead.

    If the firebird check fails, it will try to invoke "SELECT 1", and on firebird that query will fail. And the failure is interpreted as the connection is down, and therefore it tries to reconnect.

    That's probably why you get that error. If you have any other idea on how I can detect if it's a firebird db, please let me know and i'll fix the odbc code.


    On Feb 19, 2008 1:05 PM, David Revill <davidrevill at datarun.co.uk> wrote:

      That's a fair point, but db_is_up is only called in 2 places and the attempted re-connect could be done if the exec'd query fails. That way it would not be dependant on the name of the driver.

      In my application, the database was queried at the beginning of the script and the connection closed. It was explicitly re-connected at the end to post data, so the connection timeout was not an issue.
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Jonas Gauffin 
        To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org 
        Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 10:35 AM
        Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Spidermonkey ODBC


        I did that code a couple of months ago.
        The function was added since connections are closed if they are idle too long, and they were not reconnected again if that happened.



        On Feb 19, 2008 11:22 AM, David Revill <davidrevill at datarun.co.uk> wrote:

          The problem is in switch_odbc.c function db_is_up. It assumes that the variable is_firebird is true, but the setting of this variable assumes that the Firebird driver name has 'FIREBIRD', 'FB64' or 'FB32' in it.

          I commented out  the code in db_is_up and just returned a true value, as on closer inspection could not see the point of this function.

          David Revill
            ----- Original Message ----- 
            From: David Revill 
            To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org 
            Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 8:58 AM
            Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Spidermonkey ODBC


            I spotted this error a few months ago, and to my shame did not let everyone know.  I have since archived the project so cannot point you to the actual code. However, the problem is  that it assumes the name of the Firebird Driver (FB64?)  to set a boolean, so that it handle the connection test differently.

            When looking at the actual code, I actually felt that the connection test was redundant, as all it did was a select from a system table. This meant it was doing two queries for everyone required. (One to see if it could do a query, and then one to do it). I therefore commented the connection test function out.

            regards

            David Revill
              ----- Original Message ----- 
              From: Steven Brown 
              To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org 
              Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 11:34 PM
              Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Spidermonkey ODBC


              Hi,

              I'm experimenting with spidermonkey for JavaScript call control, the basics seem fine and I'm now trying to connect to an existing Firebird database, the Firebird odbc lib is installed ok as is unixODBC and I can confirm this and access the db no problem with isql, something strange happens though when I connect in spidermonkey, basically the odbc connection is made successfully, but then as soon as I call either exec or query the odbc connection starts to drop and re-connect continuously, 

              the isql output is below 

              isql -v test
              +---------------------------------------+
              | Connected!                            |
              |                                       |
              | sql-statement                         |
              | help [tablename]                      |
              | quit                                  |
              |                                       |
              +---------------------------------------+
              SQL> select first 1 * from pool_phones
              +---------------------+------------+
              | GSMNO               | ORGNO      |
              +---------------------+------------+
              | 0712345678         | 1          |
              +---------------------+------------+
              SQLRowCount returns 1
              1 rows fetched
              SQL>

              however the following test code calling the same query

              use("ODBC");
              var db = new ODBC("test","SYSDBA","masterkey");
              db.connect();
              db.query("select first 1 *  from pool_phones");
              db.nextRow();
              row = db.getData();
              console_log("INFO","HELLO " +  row["GSMNO"]  + "\n");
              exit();

              gives the following output and then just loops disconnecting and reconnecting until I shutdown freeswitch

              2008-02-18 23:26:03 [DEBUG] switch_core_state_machine.c:144 switch_core_standard_on_execute() sofia/default/1000 at 192.168.0.7:5060 Execute javascript(/usr/scripts/test1.js)
              2008-02-18 23:26:03 [DEBUG] mod_spidermonkey.c:3150 js_api_use() Loading ODBC
              2008-02-18 23:26:03 [DEBUG] switch_odbc.c:145 switch_odbc_handle_connect() Connecting test
              2008-02-18 23:26:03 [DEBUG] switch_odbc.c:174 switch_odbc_handle_connect() Connected to [test]
              2008-02-18 23:26:03 [DEBUG] switch_odbc.c:95 switch_odbc_handle_disconnect() Disconnected 0 from [test]
              2008-02-18 23:26:03 [DEBUG] switch_odbc.c:142 switch_odbc_handle_connect() Re-connecting test
              2008-02-18 23:26:03 [DEBUG] switch_odbc.c:145 switch_odbc_handle_connect() Connecting test
              2008-02-18 23:26:03 [DEBUG] switch_odbc.c:174 switch_odbc_handle_connect() Connected to [test]
              2008-02-18 23:26:03 [CRIT] switch_odbc.c:234 db_is_up() The sql server is not responding for DSN test []
              2008-02-18 23:26:03 [INFO] switch_odbc.c:239 db_is_up() The connection has been re-established
              ...
              Any ideas much appreciated

              Thanks

              Steve


















              _______________________________________________
              Freeswitch-users mailing list
              Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
              http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
              UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
              http://www.freeswitch.org



            _______________________________________________
            Freeswitch-users mailing list
            Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
            http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
            UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
            http://www.freeswitch.org


          _______________________________________________
          Freeswitch-users mailing list
          Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
          http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
          UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
          http://www.freeswitch.org






        _______________________________________________
        Freeswitch-users mailing list
        Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
        http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
        UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
        http://www.freeswitch.org


      _______________________________________________
      Freeswitch-users mailing list
      Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
      http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
      UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
      http://www.freeswitch.org






    _______________________________________________
    Freeswitch-users mailing list
    Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
    http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
    UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
    http://www.freeswitch.org



  -----Inline Attachment Follows-----

  _______________________________________________
  Freeswitch-users mailing list
  Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
  http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
  UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
  http://www.freeswitch.org





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Freeswitch-users mailing list
  Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
  http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
  UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
  http://www.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20080219/4216aa59/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Freeswitch-users mailing list