[Freeswitch-users] Performance testing: FS and own App?

Ken Rice krice at suspicious.org
Tue Dec 23 01:38:02 PST 2008


There are a number of issues you can be running into... It really depends on
how your app works, what your actual configuration of freeswitch is, disk IO
subsystem, ulimits, etc etc....



> From: Dennis <odermann at googlemail.com>
> Reply-To: <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:31:00 +0100
> To: <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Performance testing: FS and own App?
> 
> if i do the same test with the 9998, it does not to seem much better:
> 
> 20.0(4000 ms)/1.000s   5061      68.25 s         1174  xx.xx.xx.xx:5060(UDP)
> 
>   0 new calls during 1.008 s period      9 ms scheduler resolution
>   710 calls (limit 1000)                 Peak was 782 calls, after 58 s
>   0 Running, 710 Paused, 0 Woken up
>   0 out-of-call msg (discarded)
>   1 open sockets
>   595580 Total echo RTP pckts 1st stream 2809.336 last period RTP rate (kB/s)
>   0 Total echo RTP pckts 2nd stream      0.000 last period RTP rate (kB/s)
> 
>                                  Messages  Retrans   Timeout   Unexpected-Msg
>       INVITE ---------->         1174      0         0
>          100 <----------         1174      0                   0
>          180 <----------         0         0                   0
>          183 <----------         0         0                   0
>          200 <----------  E-RTD1 480       0                   0
>          ACK ---------->         480       0
>        Pause [      0ms]         480                           0
>          BYE ---------->         464       0         0
>          200 <----------         464       0                   0
> 
> what settings could i review to get more out of the server?
> 
> our setup is a new xeon quad core, 4 gb ram and ubuntu 64-bit. we also
> entered the ulimit lines and set "manage-presence" to false.
> 
> 
> thanks
> dennis
> 
> 
> 
> 2008/12/23 Ken Rice <krice at suspicious.org>:
>> Freeswitch can handle a large volume of call... I suggest you review your
>> configs to make sure you don't have any of the default or arbitrary other
>> limits in there... We routinely run > 1500 concurrent calls on dual quad
>> core hardware at call rates far above what you tested at
>> 
>> Ken
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org






More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list