[Freeswitch-users] segmentation fault by auto record

[Carole O.]

Hello,

I am running the version 1.0.1.
Do you still need me to run the debugging?

Carole


Brian West-3 wrote:
> 
> I have already labbed this up on SVN trunk and I don't get a segfault  
> but I get something else that prevents it from working properly.    We  
> are working on it today.  Also what version are you running?
> 
> /b
> 
> On Dec 10, 2008, at 9:53 AM, Michael Collins wrote:
> 
>> Thanks for reporting this. It would be helpful to know a bit more. Can
>> you start freeswitch and press F12 (or type "version" at the CLI) and
>> report back what it says?
>> Also, a backtrace (bt) is generally useful. If you could produce a
>> "bt" and a "bt full" from you core file that would be extremely
>> helpful.
>>
>> see this link for more information:
>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Debugging_Freeswitch
>>
>> you should have a "core" file for each segfault that occurred. Use the
>> gdb program to get the back trace:
>>
>> gdb /path/to/fs/binary core.xxx
>>
>> then capture the output from these two commands:
>>
>> bt <enter>
>> bt full <enter>
>>
>> When you type those commands you'll see tons of debugging info;
>> capture that and put it in a pastebin (pastebin.freeswitch.org) then
>> report back here.
>>
>> You can exit the gdb debugger by typing q <enter>
>>
>> Thanks for helping us collect information!
>>
>> -MC
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/segmentation-fault-by-auto-record-tp20935513p20950299.html
Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.