[Freeswitch-users] Windows is slow?

[Carlos Talbot]

Have you tried the latest msi build? It's based off svn 10564.

Carlos

On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Per Møller <per_moeller at mac.com> wrote:

> I have installed FS 1.0.0 on a Mac using the precompiled .dmg and FS 1.0.1
> on a Windows Vista machine using the precompiled .msi - actually the same
> machine).
>
> Using the default configuration files, and using 2 Snom 360 phones I dialed
> from extension 1000 to extension 1001. On the Mac, 1001 starts ringing
> instantly, but under Windows it takes 1-2 seconds before it starts ringing.
>
> It seems to be in the dialplan the time is spent. From the time I see this
> line on the console:
>
> [INFO] mod_dialplan_xml.c:233 dialplan_hunt() Processing 1000->1000 in
> context default
>
> Until the next thing happens it always takes at least 1 full second, but on
> the Mac it happens instantly.
>
> Why is the Windows build this much slower? Is it a known problem?
>
> I get the feeling that the majority of the FS community is Unix based,
> which
> is fine by me, but I would really like to know just how well supported and
> stable the Win32 build is and if this is currently a viable way to go, or
> if
> I should stick to Linux/BSD/Mac for production use?
>
>
> // Per
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20081202/602f14e5/attachment-0002.html