[Freeswitch-users] Complete seperation of VOIP app from FS

[Erol Akarsu]

Jonas,

This is what I want.
Do you have any documentation on mod_ivr_socket and how its API looks like?

Thanks

Erol Akarsu



----- Original Message ----
From: Jonas Gauffin <jonas.gauffin at gmail.com>
To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
Sent: Friday, August 1, 2008 9:46:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Complete seperation of VOIP app from FS

I've started to do a mod_ivr_socket a long time ago, which I never completed.
It should be considered as an alternative to the scripting languages
and gives you an easier interface than the event socket.
I created it since I wanted to move the ivr applications from my
javascripts into my own server coded in c#.

I haven't had time to finish it though. I can add it as a contrib
project if you're interested in completing it.

On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Erol Akarsu <eakarsu_33 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> David,
>
> Thanks for your clarification.
>
> Here we have to write all these commands to send to FS remotely.
> Do we have any high-level API that we can use to send command to FS and parse the results?
>
> Thanks
>
> Erol Akarsu
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: David Knell <dave at 3c.co.uk>
> To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> Sent: Friday, August 1, 2008 12:19:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Complete seperation of VOIP app from FS
>
> Hi Erol,
>
> A dialplan extension like this:
>
>  <extension name="callthrough">
>    <condition field="destination_number" expression="^0">
>      <action application="socket" data="127.0.0.1:6100 async full" />
>    </condition>
>  </extension>
>
> results in all calls to numbers starting with 0 being handled by a
> server on localhost
> listening on port 6100.  That server has full control over the call.
> Change the IP
> address to run the server on a different host.
>
> Cheers --
>
> Dave
>
>> Still searching event_socket module.
>> If we set up dialplan, all received calls will routed based on dialplan rules.
>> But at the same time, if there is remote process connected to FS through socket_module,  dialplan or remotes process will have priority to control FS behavior. Can remote process interfere dialplan rules.?
>>
>> Is it possible to define a dialplan so that one extension will be routed to a remote process and other extension will be routed to different process?
>>
>> I am thinking to abstract out IVR or any VOIP application from FS box completely and to run application on different host  or process.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Erol Akarsu
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freeswitch-users mailing list
>> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> David Knell, Director, 3C Limited
> T: 020 8114 8901  F: 020 3002 7257  M: 001 415 630 3031
> http://www.3c.co.uk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>

_______________________________________________
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org