[Freeswitch-users] Remote SIP extension deployment

[Brian West]

Chris,
	You don't want registered users going inbound to the public context,  
by design this is where people that aren't authenticated end up.  I  
fear you're close to opening up your entire dialplan to everyone which  
could result in toll fraud.  The context the user hits is set by the  
user_context variable on the user no the context variable on the  
profile in this case.  I would recommend running a copy of the default  
profile on port 5062 with the addition of ext-sip-ip and ext-rtp-ip  
and force-register-domain set to the domain in your directory you want  
to push all registrations on this profile thru.  The profile on port  
5080 will NOT authenticate calls or users and is by design for  
outbound service provider interaction ONLY.

Personally I would use a different domain for internal vs external.

/b


On Apr 27, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Chris Chen wrote:

> I don't have the luck to put the freeswitch on a public IP, and I  
> need the phones behind NAT registering with default context on port  
> 5060 while in the meantime  remote phones registered as remote SIP  
> extensions to my freeswitch on port 5080 by public context. In the  
> public context, I will have the outbound and inbound SIP trunks to  
> my service providers as well.
>
> I will try your solution to see if it fits my needs.
> Thanks,
> Chris