[Freeswitch-users] [Freeswitch-dev] bad REGISTER processing
kokoska rokoska
kokoska.rokoska at post.cz
Sat Apr 12 02:38:08 PDT 2008
Anthony Minessale napsal(a):
> The point of that NDLB-nat-connectile-dysfunction param is to perform a
> hack on the RFC and ignore the contact given in the packet and replace
> it in our database with our own contact we formulate by using the IP and
> PORT the packet was received from. Thus the PORT has to be included
> because sending invites to that exact IP and PORT is the only way we
> know will make it back over the NAT translation path.
>
> If you register to me on a public server and you say your contact is
> foo at 10.0.0.1 <mailto:foo at 10.0.0.1>. but I see the NAT hack enabled on
> your account. I notice the packet was received from a valid internet
> IP:PORT since I cannot reach 10.0.0.1 <http://10.0.0.1> I replace the
> host from your real contact with the IP you registered from. and I
> append the PORT the register came from and save that as a contact. Then
> if i send an invite to that url it will go backwards over your NAT path
> assuming you are doing keepalives on SIP.
>
Thank you, Anthony, for your answer!
It is clear to me and I think, there is no dispute between us.
But I just still don't catch why modifeid contact should be in 200 OK
response to REGISTER request. I thought the 200 OK response could
contain the same contact you received and you just store modified one
for later INVITE/NOTIFY/etc processing.
I had looked into sources and than slightly modified sofia_reg.c (5
lines of code :-) and everything works as I want.
If someone interested, I send the modified version, but:
1. I accidentaly delete original sofia_reg.c so I can't make a diff.
2. It is simple stupid workaround and I realy don't know what other
things I break with it...
<off-topic>
About our other debate:
We both have unmatched view about what I meant in my e-mails. I feel bad
about it, but I can do nothing with it. So, if you can, forget the
debate please, and make peace together :-)
</off-topic>
Best regards,
kokoska.rokoska
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list