<div dir="ltr">Ok, I updated confluence. BTW, the systemd unit files on Confluence already used group Freeswitch.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Op do 1 okt. 2015 om 18:09 schreef Bote Man <<a href="mailto:bote_radio@botecomm.com">bote_radio@botecomm.com</a>>:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">This discussion concerns the documentation for building FreeSWITCH from source. The packages take care of themselves.<br>
<br>
I wrote the part instructing users to chown freeswitch:daemon<br>
<br>
If it's better to chown freeswitch:freeswitch then by all means change it, but then the group 'freeswitch' must be created, where 'daemon' already exists as one of the system groups.<br>
<br>
I do not have the expertise to know which is the best choice, so I rely on those more knowledgeable than I.<br>
<br>
Thanks.<br>
<br>
Bote<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
> -----Original Message-----<br>
> From: Stanislav Sinyagin<br>
> Sent: Thursday, 01 October, 2015 11:53<br>
> To: FreeSWITCH Docs Team<br>
> Cc: Niek Vlessert<br>
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-docs] Freeswitch binary user and group<br>
><br>
> why docs and not the users list?<br>
><br>
> The current package installer sets up the freeswitch group. I think<br>
> it's quite alright to have it like this.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Bote Man <<a href="mailto:bote_radio@botecomm.com" target="_blank">bote_radio@botecomm.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
> > Choosing the daemon group made sense to me, but if others know a<br>
> better<br>
> > group by all means change it.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > I discovered that FS must be started as root, then it quickly drops<br>
> > privileges. As to file owner and group, I’m not so sure.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > It’s probably best to carry out this discussion on the FS-docs mailing list<br>
> > where others can see it.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Bote<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > From: Niek Vlessert [mailto:<a href="mailto:niekvlessert@gmail.com" target="_blank">niekvlessert@gmail.com</a>]<br>
> > Sent: Thursday, 01 October, 2015 07:01<br>
> > To: Bote Man<br>
> > Subject: Freeswitch user and group<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Hello Bote,<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On the Freeswitch Confluence you are the one who changed the 1.6<br>
> > installation page adding this:<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Because you most likely built FreeSWITCH™ as root you must now create<br>
> the<br>
> > user 'freeswitch' in group 'daemon' and change the FS files to owner =<br>
> > freeswitch and group = daemon (to allow system services to interact with<br>
> FS)<br>
> > and set the file mode appropriately<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > I'm building some things to make it easier for people to get Freeswitch<br>
> > running after make install (Jira FS-7910 if you're interested). Now there is<br>
> > some discussion if the daemon group is the correct one or the freeswitch<br>
> > group. Could you shed some light on 'allow system services to interact with<br>
> > FS'?<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Thanks in advance, regards,<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Niek<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > Freeswitch-docs mailing list<br>
> > <a href="mailto:Freeswitch-docs@lists.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">Freeswitch-docs@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>
> > <a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-docs" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-docs</a><br>
> ><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Freeswitch-docs mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Freeswitch-docs@lists.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">Freeswitch-docs@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-docs" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-docs</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>