<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">The FreeSWITCH team has no plans to spend any time on this, or interest in doing so.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Dec 28, 2017, at 4:38 PM, Mitch Capper <<a href="mailto:mitch.capper@gmail.com" class="">mitch.capper@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">It is true it is just GH is a more familiar workflow for many people and they already have accounts. We are just talking about a mirror, not the official repo. IF GH changes their practices down the line then it could go away. It isn't an issue to have an unofficial mirror but it would seem an official mirror is also not a big deal.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all" class=""><div class=""><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr" class=""><br class=""><div class="">~mitch</div></div></div></div>
<br class=""><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Ken Rice <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a href="mailto:krice@freeswitch.org" target="_blank" class="">krice@freeswitch.org</a>></span> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" class=""><div class="m_-2628046167731555080WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal">You do realize that Stash/BitBucket works pretty much the same way as github? Not to mention what happens when github decides its no free anymore or starts including unwanted stuff in your downloads?<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">“well github would never do those things” yeah and googlecode wouldn’t shutdown, and sourceforce would never include adware in their installers either<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b class="">From:</b> FreeSWITCH-dev [mailto:<a href="mailto:freeswitch-dev-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org" target="_blank" class="">freeswitch-dev-<wbr class="">bounces@lists.freeswitch.org</a>] <b class="">On Behalf Of </b>Mitch Capper<br class=""><b class="">Sent:</b> Thursday, December 28, 2017 11:00 AM<br class=""><b class="">To:</b> <a href="mailto:freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org" target="_blank" class="">freeswitch-dev@lists.<wbr class="">freeswitch.org</a><br class=""><b class="">Subject:</b> Re: [Freeswitch-dev] mirror to GitHub?<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p><div class=""><div class="h5"><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal">You can turn off the ability to file issues and PR on GH if so desired. I think it is great GH is being more flexible on their strict checking (I had also filed a ticket previously but back then they were not doing such adjustments). If FS doesn't want an official GH mirror it would be nice if there was an unofficial community one. Yes stash can do many of the same items but the GH interface is very easy, it has a far larger base of people who already have accounts. <u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> </p></div><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u></p></div></div><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u></p><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal">On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Chad Phillips <<a href="mailto:chad@apartmentlines.com" target="_blank" class="">chad@apartmentlines.com</a>> wrote:<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p><blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in" class=""><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal">For me the biggest value in having a mirror would be a backup location to clone FreeSWITCH in case the main repo is down. Not that it happens very often, it just always seems to happen at the very moment I’m doing something time sensitive and important ;)<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p></div><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal">I could certainly maintain my own mirror for that purpose, it just seems like a community mirror would solve the problem for everyone in one go.<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p></div><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p></div><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal">If we didn’t want to do it via Github (which I can certainly understand given the issue duplication/etc), I’d vote for having it on a secondary server in the FreeSWITCH ecosystem.<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p></div></div><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p><div class=""><div class=""><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal">On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Michael Jerris <<a href="mailto:mike@jerris.com" target="_blank" class="">mike@jerris.com</a>> wrote:<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p></div></div><blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal">I don’t see any value in adding a GitHub mirror. Stash already has the capabilities that you would get from GitHub and allows for better workflow for the core development team, a GitHub mirror would just be another place we would have to monitor for bug reports and patches, that adds overhead to us but no value.<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p><div class=""><div class=""><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p></div><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p><div class=""><blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt" class=""><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal">On Dec 16, 2017, at 10:53 PM, Adam Goode <<a href="mailto:adam@spicenitz.org" target="_blank" class="">adam@spicenitz.org</a>> wrote:<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p><div class=""><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal">Hi,<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p></div><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal">I know that the freeswitch repo has some compatibility issues with GitHub, with the two multi-author commits made some time ago.<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p></div><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p></div><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal">I recently was able to push a clone of freeswitch to GitHub by filing a ticket and asking them to disable the strict checking for those objects.<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p></div><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p></div><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal">Now that there is a way to do so, it might be worth setting up a mirror of freeswitch to GitHub. Many projects that host their main git repo elsewhere still find value in keeping a GitHub mirror. I personally would find it useful. <a href="https://help.github.com/articles/about-github-mirrors/" target="_blank" class="">https://help.github.<wbr class="">com/articles/about-github-<wbr class="">mirrors/</a><u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p></div><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p></div><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal">It's just a thought, now that there is a way around the previous technical limitation.</p></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div></body></html>