<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">I don’t see any value in adding a GitHub mirror. Stash already has the capabilities that you would get from GitHub and allows for better workflow for the core development team, a GitHub mirror would just be another place we would have to monitor for bug reports and patches, that adds overhead to us but no value.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Dec 16, 2017, at 10:53 PM, Adam Goode <<a href="mailto:adam@spicenitz.org" class="">adam@spicenitz.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">Hi,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I know that the freeswitch repo has some compatibility issues with GitHub, with the two multi-author commits made some time ago.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I recently was able to push a clone of freeswitch to GitHub by filing a ticket and asking them to disable the strict checking for those objects.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Now that there is a way to do so, it might be worth setting up a mirror of freeswitch to GitHub. Many projects that host their main git repo elsewhere still find value in keeping a GitHub mirror. I personally would find it useful. <a href="https://help.github.com/articles/about-github-mirrors/" class="">https://help.github.com/articles/about-github-mirrors/</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">It's just a thought, now that there is a way around the previous technical limitation.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thanks,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Adam</div></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>