<meta charset="utf-8"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-style: solid; padding-left: 1ex; ">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; ">The 1.07 version available at <a href="http://latest.freeswitch.org/" target="_blank" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 204); ">http://latest.freeswitch.org</a> seems to be </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; ">rebuilt each night, does this mean that a 1.07 built yesterday is </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; ">different from one built today?</span></blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>Yes. Think of it as a release candidate for 1.0.8</div><div><br></div><div>The git head is pretty much the most stable. Development tends to move too fast to make more regular 'stable' releases. You should of course test releases work as expected before putting them into production.</div>
<div><br></div><div>If you find a Git version that you're comfortable with, then you can roll out that version across your whole network even if there's a newer Git head by running:</div><div>> git clone git://<a href="http://git.freeswitch.org/freeswitch.git">git.freeswitch.org/freeswitch.git</a></div>
<div>> cd freeswitch.git</div><div>> git checkout GIT_HASH</div><div><br></div><div>I believe the developers have been discussing making a 1.0 stable branch soon with only bugfix and stability improvements and moving new development onto a new 1.2 branch. If that happens then perhaps you'll be more comfortable with that branch. Not sure when that's planned for though.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-Steve</div><div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 10 May 2011 19:39, Tom Parrott <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tomp@tomp.co.uk">tomp@tomp.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi,<br>
<br>
I work for a company selling call tracking services, and we have<br>
recently put into production a 3 node Freeswitch cluster to use features<br>
such as call recording and call announce.<br>
<br>
We are using the event socket feature to control freeswitch from our<br>
custom written service.<br>
<br>
I have found Freeswitch a pleasure to use, and much easier to get along<br>
with than Asterisk.<br>
<br>
However one thing that has concerned me is the lack of regular<br>
point-in-time releases.<br>
<br>
When putting services in production, we use RPMs to allow us to easily<br>
upgrade (and if need be rollback) software versions.<br>
<br>
The 1.07 version available at <a href="http://latest.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">http://latest.freeswitch.org</a> seems to be<br>
rebuilt each night, does this mean that a 1.07 built yesterday is<br>
different from one built today?<br>
<br>
If I can offer any assistance with the automation of point-in-time<br>
tagged releases I would be happy to help, as I feel this would make<br>
Freeswitch more attractive to commercial operations as it would easily<br>
fit into well defined release processes.<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
Tom<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org">FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev</a><br>
UNSUBSCRIBE:<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev</a><br>
<a href="http://www.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitch.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>