<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:courier, monaco, monospace, sans-serif;font-size:12pt"><DIV>Like I said, I will have much more interest in the build process</DIV>
<DIV>when I get to that point in my devel track.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Meanwhile, before we optimize anything furthur in that way,</DIV>
<DIV>I'd like to see how that 32 cpu box does in the same testing </DIV>
<DIV>I have already performed on linux and mac with the code in the </DIV>
<DIV>same state it already is. Can we come visit it soon? =D</DIV>
<DIV><BR> </DIV>
<DIV>Anthony Minessale II<BR><BR>FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/<BR>ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/<BR><BR>AIM: anthm<BR>MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com<BR>JABBER:anthony.minessale@gmail.com<BR>IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch</DIV>
<DIV><BR>FreeSWITCH Developer Conference<BR>sip:888@66.250.68.194<BR>iax:guest@66.250.68.194/888<BR>googletalk:freeswitch@gmail.com<BR>pstn:712-432-7800</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: courier, monaco, monospace, sans-serif"><BR><BR>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif">----- Original Message ----<BR>From: Roman Shaposhnik <rvs@sun.com><BR>To: freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org<BR>Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 11:01:49 PM<BR>Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] Compiling error - libsndfile.so<BR><BR>
<DIV>On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 05:58 -0700, Anthony Minessale wrote:<BR>> Stuart, Since this is a mailing list I am going to talk to some other<BR>> people to save time on mutiple emails, excuse me a minute:<BR>> <BR>> Roman, Here is the downside to your suggestion, this guy is unhappy<BR>> just because he *thinks* we keep his code in our tree.<BR><BR> I sort of disagree. I believe that this guys is unhappy because<BR>what we have in FreeSwitch now is kind of worst of both worlds --<BR>we don't really want to rely on preinstalled and prepackaged libraries<BR>available on the system, yet we also don't want to bite the bullet<BR>and privatize the code. Personally, I think this is one of the <BR>greatest myth of OpenSource that all you have to do in order to<BR>build a reliable package is: ./configure && make && make install.<BR><BR> What we currently have in FreeSwith is an attempt to rely on<BR>that. I've used to do
lots of packaging for Solaris and believe<BR>me -- there's not much else I hate more than autotools complexity. :-(<BR><BR> Anyway, it looks like my proposal doesn't really resonate with<BR>lots of folks here, which means I have to come up with extra<BR>benefits. My angle would be a performance one. Stay tuned...<BR><BR>Thanks,<BR>Roman.<BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Freeswitch-dev mailing list<BR>Freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org<BR><A href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev" target=_blank>http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev</A><BR>UNSUBSCRIBE:<A href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev" target=_blank>http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev</A><BR><A href="http://www.freeswitch.org/" target=_blank>http://www.freeswitch.org</A></DIV></DIV><BR></DIV></div><br></body></html>