[Freeswitch-dev] Video of the WebRTC client gets locked up
Yan Brenman
ybrenman at xopnetworks.com
Thu Mar 13 19:18:16 MSK 2014
Hello,
I have been running 1.4.beta (WebRTC enabled) branch of the FreeSWTICH
with SIPml5 clients and I am constantly getting
client video freeze in about a minute after call is established and
video shows up. Here is the relevant part of the log from the console:
2014-03-12 15:24:00.923640 [NOTICE] switch_core_media.c:2577 Choose
video Candidate cid: 1 proto: udp type: host addr:99.8.141.165:64234
<http://137.79.217.63:64234/>
2014-03-12 15:24:00.923640 [NOTICE] switch_core_media.c:2577 Choose
video Candidate cid: 2 proto: udp type: host addr:99.8.141.165:64234
<http://137.79.217.63:64234/>
2014-03-12 15:24:00.923640 [NOTICE] switch_core_media.c:2582 Save video
Candidate cid: 1 proto: udp type: host addr:192.168.239.1:64235
<http://192.168.239.1:64235/>
2014-03-12 15:24:00.923640 [NOTICE] switch_core_media.c:2582 Save video
Candidate cid: 2 proto: udp type: host addr:192.168.239.1:64235
<http://192.168.239.1:64235/>
2014-03-12 15:24:00.923640 [NOTICE] switch_core_media.c:2706 setting
remote video ice addr to99.8.141.165:64234
<http://137.79.217.63:64234/>based on candidate
2014-03-12 15:24:00.923640 [NOTICE] switch_core_media.c:2726 setting
remote rtcp video addr to99.8.141.165:64234
<http://137.79.217.63:64234/>based on candidate
2014-03-12 15:24:00.923640 [INFO] switch_core_media.c:2745 RE-Activating
video ICE
2014-03-12 15:24:00.923640 [NOTICE] switch_rtp.c:3775 Activating RTP
video ICE: +Pz0ELVd4tEZygTU:ZGabdph1JK6l9boM99.8.141.165:64234
<http://137.79.217.63:64234/>
2014-03-12 15:24:00.923640 [INFO] switch_core_media.c:2794 Activating
video RTCP PORT 64234
2014-03-12 15:24:00.923640 [INFO] switch_core_media.c:2802 Skipping
video RTCP ICE (Same as RTP)
2014-03-12 15:24:00.923640 [INFO] switch_core_media.c:4703 RE-SETTING
video DTLS
2014-03-12 15:24:00.923640 [INFO] switch_rtp.c:2878 Activate RTP/RTCP
video DTLS server
2014-03-12 15:24:00.962458 [NOTICE] switch_rtp.c:1132 Auto Changing
stun/rtp/dtls port from99.8.141.165:64234
<http://137.79.217.63:64234/>to192.168.239.1:64235
<http://192.168.239.1:64235/>
2014-03-12 15:24:01.003229 [NOTICE] switch_rtp.c:1132 Auto Changing
stun/rtp/dtls port from99.8.141.165:64234
<http://137.79.217.63:64234/>to192.168.239.1:64235
<http://192.168.239.1:64235/>
2014-03-12 15:24:01.982369 [WARNING] switch_rtp.c:857
sofia/internal/1003 at 192.168.239.150 <mailto:1003 at 192.168.239.150>got
stun binding response 487 Role Conflict
2014-03-12 15:24:01.982369 [WARNING] switch_rtp.c:868 Changing role to
CONTROLLED
2014-03-12 15:24:01.982369 [WARNING] switch_rtp.c:857
sofia/internal/1003 at 192.168.239.150 <mailto:1003 at 192.168.239.150>got
stun binding response 487 Role Conflict
2014-03-12 15:24:01.982369 [WARNING] switch_rtp.c:868 Changing role to
CONTROLLED
Just one more thing wanted to mention is that my clients are running on
the same subnet as the FreeSWITCH and the FreeSWITCH is running
inside of the Linux CentOS VM. Could the root of the problem be the fact
that FreeSWICH is running in the VM and ICE tries to use the port
on the VM interface (192.168.239.1 <http://192.168.239.1:64235/>)?
I would greatly appreciate any piece of advise on the subject.
Thanks
Yan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-dev/attachments/20140313/19807ead/attachment-0001.html
Join us at ClueCon 2013 Aug 6-8, 2013
More information about the FreeSWITCH-dev
mailing list