[Freeswitch-dev] is there any info abount which git tag/ Freeswitch release is stable?

[Steven Ayre]

>
> I believe the developers have been discussing making a 1.0 stable branch
> soon with only bugfix and stability improvements and moving new development
> onto a new 1.2 branch. If that happens then perhaps you'll be more
> comfortable with that branch. Not sure when that's planned for though.


The issue by the way is with developers. While there's a lot of developers
and plenty of people using FS in the wild testing and making bug reports on
Jira and plenty of people volunteering support on the list and IRC,
something like 90% of the code is still written by half a dozen people. It's
damn good code though. :) That's too much to make it easy for them to both
maintain a stable branch and work on the newer branch, so up to this point
it has been better to focus on making FS complete, feature rich and stable
all in the same branch. Once the branches diverge, someone is going to have
to both handle bug reports for 2 different codebases and also look at all
1.2 changes to decide whether any are work backporting to 1.0 which won't
always be trivial if the code diverges significantly.

-Steve


On 12 May 2011 08:45, Steven Ayre <steveayre at gmail.com> wrote:

>  The 1.07 version available at http://latest.freeswitch.org seems to be rebuilt
>> each night, does this mean that a 1.07 built yesterday is different from
>> one built today?
>
>
> Yes. Think of it as a release candidate for 1.0.8
>
> The git head is pretty much the most stable. Development tends to move too
> fast to make more regular 'stable' releases. You should of course test
> releases work as expected before putting them into production.
>
> If you find a Git version that you're comfortable with, then you can roll
> out that version across your whole network even if there's a newer Git head
> by running:
> > git clone git://git.freeswitch.org/freeswitch.git
> > cd freeswitch.git
> > git checkout GIT_HASH
>
> I believe the developers have been discussing making a 1.0 stable branch
> soon with only bugfix and stability improvements and moving new development
> onto a new 1.2 branch. If that happens then perhaps you'll be more
> comfortable with that branch. Not sure when that's planned for though.
>
> -Steve
>
>
> On 10 May 2011 19:39, Tom Parrott <tomp at tomp.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I work for a company selling call tracking services, and we have
>> recently put into production a 3 node Freeswitch cluster to use features
>> such as call recording and call announce.
>>
>> We are using the event socket feature to control freeswitch from our
>> custom written service.
>>
>> I have found Freeswitch a pleasure to use, and much easier to get along
>> with than Asterisk.
>>
>> However one thing that has concerned me is the lack of regular
>> point-in-time releases.
>>
>> When putting services in production, we use RPMs to allow us to easily
>> upgrade (and if need be rollback) software versions.
>>
>> The 1.07 version available at http://latest.freeswitch.org seems to be
>> rebuilt each night, does this mean that a 1.07 built yesterday is
>> different from one built today?
>>
>> If I can offer any assistance with the automation of point-in-time
>> tagged releases I would be happy to help, as I feel this would make
>> Freeswitch more attractive to commercial operations as it would easily
>> fit into well defined release processes.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Tom
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-dev/attachments/20110512/49d231c8/attachment-0001.html