[Freeswitch-dev] Call to registered phone behind NAT

[Brian West]

It still doesn't negate the fact that agressive-nat shouldn't be used it breaks may may things.  If it wasn't being detected properly then the local-network-acl or the inbound-nat-acl was wrong.

/b

On May 24, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:

> It is easy to just say that the other end should be fixed, there are enough software titles that do that  already and end up not working well.  I bring this up because I am chasing down the exposure of a bug in other VoIP software that used to not be present in a them->FS exchange but tightening of the FS code on what it accepts exposed the bug.  So when it starts to get discussed that the other side should fix itself, I feel it important to bring this internet founding principle up.