[Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF - Deja Vu

devel at thom.fr.eu.org devel at thom.fr.eu.org
Wed Jun 30 15:29:29 PDT 2010


I’ll give a try tomorrow with HWEC disabled.

 

De : freeswitch-dev-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-dev-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] De la part de Moises Silva
Envoyé : mercredi 30 juin 2010 23:15
À : freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
Objet : Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF - Deja Vu

 

Can you try 3.5.12 with and without hw ec enabled and check if cid is there?


Moises Silva
Senior Software Engineer
Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R 9T3 Canada
t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. moy at sangoma.com



On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:58 PM, François Legal <devel at thom.fr.eu.org> wrote:

Hello,

 

did try to upgrade to wanpipe 3.5.12 (from 3.5.11) and thought the DTMF problem seems to be fixed (did not had the opportunity to really test it thourougthly), I seem to have lost the CID feature in the upgrade.

Roll back to 3.5.11 and CID is back there.

 

François

 

 

On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:54:19 -0400, Moises Silva wrote:

Hello,

I spent a few hours playing with DTMF stuff and analog cards and it seems there is 2 issues at hand.

1. Bleeding DTMF.
2. Echo DTMF.

The first issue, for software DTMF, can be solved with Anthony's pre buffer size feature. However that introduces delay by design, and it will not work for large DTMFs (if the dtmf is larger than the buffer).

For hardware DTMF a new driver was just released that includes a configuration to allow the EC chip to perform the dtmf tone removal which cuts down the bleeding to only 20ms (in my testing) there is no way a DTMF detector will consider that a valid DTMF and therefore the bleeding should be solved with no delay introduced. The option is HWEC_DTMF_REMOVAL = YES, must be added along with the usual TDMV_HW_DTMF = YES in wanpipex.conf

Ideally the software DTMF detector (in this case teletone) should cut it at the same time that it detects it. I thought may be spandsp would help, but it seems spandsp does not have an option to squelch the dtmf tone. May be Steve can help with that. I pinged him on IRC and he said he may get some code working, but there is no date for that and also that would involve integrating spandsp into FreeTDM, any reason to not do this now that spandsp is LGPL?

As for the echo dtmf. It seems sometimes an outgoing DTMF may be detected as incoming DTMF due to echo. There is not much we can do there if you don't have echo cancellation. If however you have this issue even with HW EC, call Sangoma tech support and we will be happy to look at the issue.

In another note, I added a variable and application to disable DTMF. 




That will disable DTMF (either software or hardware) in the leg executing that app. If you want to disable in the outgoing leg (before a bridge), you must export a special variable:




The DTMF is enabled automatically on each call, so there is no need to enable it for each call. But in case you need to enable it:




Moises Silva
Senior Software Engineer
Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R 9T3 Canada
t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. moy at sangoma.com



On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote:

openzap_pre_buffer_size is a variable you can set to specific number of MS 60 for example. 

it will pre_buffer the audio on the channel so when you detect dtmf it will completely drop the buffer so all of the original

dtmf should be dropped as well.  probably if the dtmf is too long then it will cause problems anyway.

if that pre buffer does not fix anything it would point to echo or bleeding.

We could make a variable to disable dtmf detection completely on a per-call basis possibly but you will still probably hear it bleeding.

This type of problem was reported fixed with sangoma because of the echo canceler.

I don't use dahdi or digium stuff much so I can't comment on what happens when you use it.

 

 

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:41 AM, François Legal <devel at thom.fr.eu.org> wrote:

Does this really fix it ?
I wonder because the problem I see here is also that the FXS side detects
the DTMF and then queues it on the FXO side for generation. That leads to
the called party receiving twice the DTMF, the first one is the inband
DTMF, the second is the one queued/generated by the FXO channel.

For a clean fix, I guess some kind of application should be created, that
would prevent DTMF to be queued on the other channel. Such application
would then be called before the bridge. Maybe there is a cleaner way to do
this.

François


On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:23:13 -0500, "Jeroen C. van Gelderen"
<jeroeng at thegreek.com> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have a problem that is very similar to a problem
> reported by François [1] except for the fact that
> my FXS and FXO ports are on a Xorcom Astribank
> device instead of a Sangoma.
>
> To quote François: "The problem is that each leg of
> the bridge is detecting the inband DTMF, and so
> [F]reeswitch sends each detected DTMF from one leg
> to the other, and so on and so forth (as each leg
> detects the DTMF again and again)"
>
> HIS words but evidenced by the MY log :)
>
> The snippet below has DTMF coming in on the FXS port
> (1:1) and bouncing between it and the FXO port (3:1).
> The ports are simply bridged together with
>
>   "bridge(OpenZap/3/1/F)" or "bridge(OpenZap/3/1/w)"
>
> I'm running:
>
> FreeSWITCH version: 1.0.head (git-01c0c69 2010-06-08 16-22-21 -0500)
> dahdi: Version: SVN-trunk-r8762
>
> Output of lsdahdi at end of message.
>
> ----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----
> [...]
> 2010-06-13 04:18:39.217256 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:721 queue DTMF [4]
> 2010-06-13 04:18:39.256255 [DEBUG] zap_io.c:2062 3:1 GENERATE DTMF [4]
> 2010-06-13 04:18:39.397253 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:721 queue DTMF [4]
> 2010-06-13 04:18:39.439252 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:780 Dropping frame!
(write
> not ready)
> 2010-06-13 04:18:39.439252 [DEBUG] zap_io.c:2062 1:1 GENERATE DTMF [4]
> 2010-06-13 04:18:39.637249 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:721 queue DTMF [4]
> 2010-06-13 04:18:39.676248 [DEBUG] zap_io.c:2062 3:1 GENERATE DTMF [4]
> 2010-06-13 04:18:39.859244 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:780 Dropping frame!
(write
> not ready)
> [...ad infinitum...]
> ----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----
>
> Because I needed DTMF pass-through working "now"
> I applied an ugly HACK. This drops DTMF tones
> detected on spans 3 and 4 (which are my FXO
> spans). This is very WRONG but it does solve
> my immediate problem:
>
> ----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----
> diff --git a/libs/openzap/mod_openzap/mod_openzap.c
> b/libs/openzap/mod_openzap/mod_openzap.c
> index 5aebfea..ff3b081 100644
> --- a/libs/openzap/mod_openzap/mod_openzap.c
> +++ b/libs/openzap/mod_openzap/mod_openzap.c
> @@ -718,8 +718,12 @@ static switch_status_t
> channel_read_frame(switch_core_session_t *session, switch
>                 for (p = dtmf; p && *p; p++) {
>                         if (is_dtmf(*p)) {
>                                 _dtmf.digit = *p;
> -                               zap_log(ZAP_LOG_DEBUG, "queue DTMF
[%c]\n",
> *p);
> -                               switch_channel_queue_dtmf(channel,
&_dtmf);
> +                               if (tech_pvt->zchan->span_id == 3 ||
> tech_pvt->zchan->span_id == 4) {
> +                                       zap_log(ZAP_LOG_DEBUG, "Ignoring
> DTMF [%c] on FXO port %d:%d\n", *p, tech_pvt->zchan->span_id,
> tech_pvt->zchan->chan_id)
> ;
> +                               } else {
> +                                       zap_log(ZAP_LOG_DEBUG, "queue
DTMF
> [%c]\n", *p);
> +
switch_channel_queue_dtmf(channel,
> &_dtmf);
> +                               }
>                         }
>                 }
>         }
> ----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----
>
> Can someone point me in the "right" direction
> instead? Do I need to do this at the OpenZAP/DAHDI
> level by disabling some kind of DTMF detection
> like was done for the Sangoma driver?
>
> Any and all pointers appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
> -Slim
>
> [1] [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org/msg02830.htm
> l
>
> [Freeswitch-dev] Problem with sending
> DTMF on FXS port bridged to   an FXO port
>
http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-dev/2010-April/003607.html
>
>
> ----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----
> [root at localhost freeswitch]# lsdahdi
> ### Span  1: XBUS-00/XPD-00 "Xorcom XPD #00/00: FXS" (MASTER)
>   1 FXS        FXOKS
>   2 FXS        FXOKS
>   3 FXS        FXOKS
>   4 FXS        FXOKS
>   5 FXS        FXOKS
>   6 FXS        FXOKS
>   7 FXS        FXOKS
>   8 FXS        FXOKS
>   9 Output     FXOKS
>  10 Output     FXOKS
>  11 Input      FXOKS
>  12 Input      FXOKS
>  13 Input      FXOKS
>  14 Input      FXOKS
> ### Span  2: XBUS-00/XPD-10 "Xorcom XPD #00/10: FXS"
>  15 FXS        FXOKS
>  16 FXS        FXOKS
>  17 FXS        FXOKS
>  18 FXS        FXOKS
>  19 FXS        FXOKS
>  20 FXS        FXOKS
>  21 FXS        FXOKS
>  22 FXS        FXOKS
> ### Span  3: XBUS-00/XPD-20 "Xorcom XPD #00/20: FXO"
>  23 FXO        FXSKS        RED
>  24 FXO        FXSKS        RED
>  25 FXO        FXSKS        RED
>  26 FXO        FXSKS        RED
>  27 FXO        FXSKS        RED
>  28 FXO        FXSKS        RED
>  29 FXO        FXSKS        RED
>  30 FXO        FXSKS        RED
> ### Span  4: XBUS-00/XPD-30 "Xorcom XPD #00/30: FXO"
>  31 FXO        FXSKS        RED
>  32 FXO        FXSKS        RED
>  33 FXO        FXSKS        RED
>  34 FXO        FXSKS        RED
>  35 FXO        FXSKS        RED
>  36 FXO        FXSKS        RED
>  37 FXO        FXSKS        RED
>  38 FXO        FXSKS        RED
> ----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----
>
>
> Cheers,
> -Slim
> --
> Jeroen C. "Slim" van Gelderen
> Olympic Sports Data Services
> Email: jeroeng at thegreek.com
> Phone: +1 876 953 6182 x128
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
> http://www.freeswitch.org

_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
FreeSWITCH-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org





-- 
Anthony Minessale II

FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire

AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com <mailto:MSN%3Aanthony_minessale at hotmail.com> 
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com <mailto:PAYPAL%3Aanthony.minessale at gmail.com> 
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org <mailto:sip%3A888 at conference.freeswitch.org> 
googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org <mailto:googletalk%3Aconf%2B888 at conference.freeswitch.org> 
pstn:+19193869900


_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
FreeSWITCH-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org

 


_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
FreeSWITCH-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-dev/attachments/20100701/387ff323/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list