[Freeswitch-dev] mod_xml_odbc

[Ken Rice]

Take a look in my contrib directory theres a SQL schema that I am already
using w/ mysql and some same data... It might need to be slightly modified
for some recent user directory changes, but this works quite well w/ the
curl stuff already and my thoughts were to do exactly what you are starting
down the road for now...

I don't think its really nessecary to add an additional table for user
attribs, where keeping the vars and params split out does since the former
are pretty much set by the coders where params and vars can be many and not
nessecarily the same everywhere


K


> From: Leon de Rooij <leon at scarlet-internet.nl>
> Reply-To: "freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org"
> <freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org>
> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:48:48 +0200
> To: "freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org"
> <freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org>
> Subject: [Freeswitch-dev] mod_xml_odbc
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I'd like to generate user directory xml directly in FS to bypass http
> +php (or other scripting language) entirely. So I started writing a
> module to do just that. It's still rough - I don't code c very often -
> but it works.
> 
> http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/XML-3
> 
> Currently all queries are statically defined in the module so users
> cannot deviate from the sql schema. Bkw suggested to have a look at
> mod_lcr which look really cool, though I'm not really sure yet how to
> get the same behavior in this module.
> 
> The sql schema (without indexes for readability) currently looks like
> this:
> 
> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/9427
> 
> In the module, I'm doing 7 queries:
> 
> Q1: Get domain_id and user_id
> Q2: Get domain_params
> Q3: Get domain_variables
> Q4: Get user_attrs
> Q5: Get user_params
> Q6: Get user_variables
> Q7: Get groups
> 
> Where Q2-Q6 should return a list of name/value pairs.
> 
> To make things more configurable by the user of the module, I could
> place all queries in the configuration file, like this:
> 
> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/9426
> 
> Do you think that would be acceptable ?
> 
> Then I'd remove all code that automatically generates tables (which
> would make the code a lot cleaner and I won't need to find out how to
> set auto_increment as it's different for each database).
> 
> Are there any other things I should think about ?
> 
> Do you think this module could be accepted in FS ? :-)
> 
> Thanks for the input !
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Leon
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-dev mailing list
> Freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
> http://www.freeswitch.org