[Freeswitch-dev] freeswitch as a standard-alone sip server
telecomsphere at 163.com
Fri Apr 18 11:12:42 EDT 2008
I think I can understand Pete Kay. His concern is whether Freeswitch can have registration function in one day, or the development activity for this feature has been scheduled.
By the way, as said in the website documents, Freeswitch is a multi-threaded softswitch and has different endpoints for each protocols, SIP, H.323, etc. My question is, does each endpoint use multiple threads, say SIP endpoint? It seems that sofia is not thread-safe, how did Freeeswitch use this library? If it is used in multi-thread environment, there is much work to do.
Don't have time to look into the code yet. And see your back and forth email.
Thanks for your reply!
This really isn't for us to decide. OpenSER is built for that so you
have to make the choice on what tool to use for your needs.
On Apr 18, 2008, at 7:41 AM, Pete Kay wrote:
> I have a question for the creators of freeswitch. With freeswitch,
> people are still going to need Openser to do sip registering and it
> is understandable that a pure sip register is more efficient. The
> problem with Openser is that it is not that easy to config as
> compared to freeswitch. So, I am wondering does it make sense for
> use part of the current freeswitch function to just make a
> "freeser" ( for pure sip registration) so that users can enjoy an
> efficient sip server and the ease-of-use from the freeswitch design?
sip:brian at freeswitch.org
Freeswitch-dev mailing list
Freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Freeswitch-dev