[Freeswitch-dev] Port to uClinux?
jeff.knighton at voiceriver.com
Mon Feb 5 13:26:36 EST 2007
I've started with a uClinux port (on a blackfin BF537-STAMP) of
Freeswitch. My goal was to get a very minimal FS working (FS core +
mod_sofia + mod_g711 + mod_dialplan_xml + mod_echo).
As I understand it, this configuration has the following dependencies:
SQLLite is already ported to uClinux.
My plan was to first get all the libraries ported to uClinux and tested
separately. I've started on sofia-sip and have it running on uClinux. I
haven't touched the others yet.
> Thanks for the feedback, and sorry about the bounce. I've got this list
> configured properly through my filter now.
> On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 11:21 -0500, Michael Jerris wrote:
>> We have discussed this with David some. The biggest issue on the
>> blackfin relates to floating point math. The main places that you will
>> see this in freeswitch is the codecs, the resample code, and in a couple
>> places in applications like conference. For the codecs, much of the
>> work is already done (like for speex, David's changes are already worked
>> into our tree) but would need some more work. For the applications like
>> conference, it would need small or no modifications. The resample code
>> is the only code that would needs some real work, I think David can
>> comment better than any of us how much work that would take.
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: freeswitch-dev-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
>> > bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Bill Cox
>> > Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 10:46 AM
>> > To: freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
>> > Subject: [Freeswitch-dev] Port to uClinux?
>> > Hi.
>> > I'm helping a friend build an Asterisk appliance based on David
>> > Rowe's Free Telephony Project (www.rowetel.com). Asterisk has mostly
>> > been ported to uClinux, and can run well on the Blackfin DSP
>> > It seems to me that the FreeSwitch architecture has a lot more promise
>> > than that of Asterisk long-term, but it relies on far more external
>> > packages. Given that, how hard would it be to port FreeSwitch to
>> > uClinux?
>> > Thanks,
>> > Bill
>> Freeswitch-dev mailing list
>> Freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
> Freeswitch-dev mailing list
> Freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
More information about the Freeswitch-dev